microsoft / microsoft/TypeScript
Feature Request: Make ES module exports conform to an interface using triple slash directive
Dieses Issue hat noch niemand übernommen.
- Vorherrschende Sprache
- Go
- Sterne
- 111k
- Forks
- 14.3k
- Ø Merge
- 2 T. 4 Std.
- Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
- 132
Beschreibung
Search Terms
ESM, ES module, EcmaScript Module, Interface, Exports, triple slash directive, module
Suggestion
I want to be able to enforce and ESM's exports to conform to an interface.
Here's an ESM that exports some values:

This ESM is going to be consumed by some system; the ESM acts as configuration for that system.
The system could expose interfaces/types for all possible exports, and users apply them manually:

But this is manual work, and thus error-prone.
I propose to be able to do:

The exact syntax TBD.
Adding
/// <exports name="ConfigInterface" from="system-that-needs-configuration" />
will tell typescript about which interface the ESM exports should adhere to and where to find it.
If this is implemented in a triple slash directive this can also work for non-ts files.
Use Cases
I want users of storybook to be able to configure it with ease using modern code.
CommonJS isn't tree-shake-able, which is important to us. There's a pretty detailed RFC for this feature for storybook here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/15aAALZBl0GTBEKgJN219ebzJ8LUJf2TVJ3hQdkNdLvQ/edit#
Tools like babel, eslint & webpack currently are or can be configured using CommonJS modules; as the ecosystem for ESM is improving, being able to add an interface to an ESM becomes really useful.
Tools could start using ESM for configuration more, which has clear benefits over CommoNJS.
Examples
Here's a config file that is annotated with the triple slash directive:

Here's the interface that's being referred to:

This should warn the user that logLevel = 'any' is not a valid value.
Checklist
My suggestion meets these guidelines:
- This wouldn't be a breaking change in existing TypeScript/JavaScript code
- This wouldn't change the runtime behavior of existing JavaScript code
- This could be implemented without emitting different JS based on the types of the expressions
- This isn't a runtime feature (e.g. library functionality, non-ECMAScript syntax with JavaScript output, etc.)
- This feature would agree with the rest of TypeScript's Design Goals.
Beitragsleitfaden
Erste Schritte
- Lies das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
- Schreib ins Issue, dass du es übernimmst — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
- Forke das Repository und arbeite in einem Branch.
- Öffne einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.
Rechercherichtung
Es wird keine Quelldatei oder kein Test-Einstiegspunkt genannt. Beginne mit der Prüfung der vorgeschlagenen triple-slash directive und der ESM export/interface-Beispiele; abgeschlossen wäre die Aufgabe, wenn eine abgestimmte Syntax und eine Validierung vorhanden sind, die ungültige Exporte wie logLevel = 'any' meldet.
Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.
Bewertung
- Tech-Stack
- javascript, typescript
- Bereich
- compilers
- Issue-Typ
- Feature
- Schwierigkeit
- 5/5
- Geschätzter Aufwand
- Über eine Woche
- Aktivitätsstatus
- Veraltet
- Klarheit
- Muss geklärt werden
- Anfängerfreundlichkeit
- 25/100