microsoft / microsoft/TypeScript
Improve structure, formatting, (human) parsability and readabiliy of errors
Dieses Issue hat noch niemand übernommen.
- Vorherrschende Sprache
- Go
- Sterne
- 111k
- Forks
- 14.3k
- Ø Merge
- 2 T. 4 Std.
- Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
- 132
Beschreibung
Suggestion
Comparing my DX/UX experience from working with flow versus TypeScript, the error messages is one of the few things that I preferred how flow does it. Especially after flow v0.66 release. I believe they integrated alot from the glow project. I would love it if typescript would adopt some for the formatting and helpful information that flow has in their error messages.
This blog post explains more about the flow 0.66 error message changes: http://medium.com/flow-type/better-flow-error-messages-for-the-javascript-ecosystem-73b6da948ae2
Here are a couple of things I can think of that would help me find the actual problem/conflict that I can take action on:
- prettifying/formatting the outputted types
- syntax highlighting
- bold/highlight the conflicting parts
Use Cases
Every time typescript finds an error (which us developers will have to read and understand and take action on :) ). I am talking both on the command line but also in IDEs like vscode. There is an issue related to this in the vscode repo here: https://github.com/Microsoft/vscode/issues/54503
Examples
Heres and example of the ginormous unstructured blob of text that is a ts error with big types involved:
Type '({ expandedRowIds, orderBy, currentPage, filters: { columns: columnFilters, period, categoryIds }, ...restUrlQueryState }: Pick<Overwrite<DataGridUrlQueryStateUrlSerialized, { filters: { columns: { promotionName?: string | undefined; startDate?: string | undefined; endDate?: string | undefined; "sumFacts.switching.amount"?: string | undefined; "sumFacts.netLift.profit"?: string | undefined; "sumFacts.netLift.amount"?: string | undefined; }; period: Date[]; categoryIds: string[]; }; }>, "hiddenColumnNames" | "filters" | "orderBy" | "expandedRowIds" | "currentPage">, pageSize: any) => Dictionary<any>' is not assignable to type '(a: Overwrite<DataGridUrlQueryStateUrlSerialized, { filters: { columns: { promotionName?: string | undefined; startDate?: string | undefined; endDate?: string | undefined; "sumFacts.switching.amount"?: string | undefined; "sumFacts.netLift.profit"?: string | undefined; "sumFacts.netLift.amount"?: string | undefined; }; period: Date[]; categoryIds: string[]; }; }>) => DataGridQueryVariables'.
Checklist
My suggestion meets these guidelines:
- This wouldn't be a breaking change in existing TypeScript/JavaScript code
- This wouldn't change the runtime behavior of existing JavaScript code
- This could be implemented without emitting different JS based on the types of the expressions
- This isn't a runtime feature (e.g. library functionality, non-ECMAScript syntax with JavaScript output, etc.)
- This feature would agree with the rest of TypeScript's Design Goals.
Beitragsleitfaden
Erste Schritte
- Lies das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
- Schreib ins Issue, dass du es übernimmst — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
- Forke das Repository und arbeite in einem Branch.
- Öffne einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.
Rechercherichtung
Der Issue nennt keine TypeScript-Quelldateien oder Tests; beginne damit nachzuverfolgen, wie Compilerdiagnosen für die CLI erzeugt werden und wie diese Diagnosen anschließend IDEs wie VS Code erreichen. Lege das gewünschte Formatierungs- und Hervorhebungsverhalten anhand des verlinkten Flow-Beispiels fest, bevor du Tests identifizierst, die dieses Verhalten erfassen können.
Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.
Bewertung
- Tech-Stack
- typescript
- Bereich
- compilers, developer-experience
- Issue-Typ
- Feature
- Schwierigkeit
- 5/5
- Geschätzter Aufwand
- Über eine Woche
- Aktivitätsstatus
- Veraltet
- Klarheit
- Muss geklärt werden
- Anfängerfreundlichkeit
- 25/100