microsoft / microsoft/TypeScript
Compiler warning for always true/false strict inequality expression
Dieses Issue hat noch niemand übernommen.
- Vorherrschende Sprache
- Go
- Sterne
- 111k
- Forks
- 14.3k
- Ø Merge
- 2 T. 4 Std.
- Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
- 132
Beschreibung
Search Terms
type guard warning if always true false non-identity inequality
Suggestion
The compiler should emit a warning if it can determine that an expression using a strict inequality check (!==) always returns true or false. It already does this for strict equality checks (===).
Use Cases
Like the warnings for the strict equality check, it helps identifying unreachable code blocks or unnecessary if blocks which can get introduced during refactoring of existing code or during carefree creation of new code.
Examples
The following function definition emits an error ("This condition will always return 'false' since the types '"abc"' and '"xyz"' have no overlap."):
function fn(p: "abc") {
if (p === "xyz") {
}
}
But this function definition compiles just fine (a possible error message could be "This condition will always return 'true' since the types '"abc"' and '"abc"' overlap completely":
function fn2(p: "abc") {
if (p !== "abc") {
}
}
It even correctly type-guards the type of p inside the if block (it becomes never).
Two other scenarios which trigger this non-warning, but could be harder to detect:
// typeof checks
function fn3(p: string) {
if (typeof p !== "string") {
}
}
// the length of a tuple
function fn4(p: []) {
if (p.length !== 0) {
}
}
The last example doesn't type-guard the value of p correctly to never even though p.length is correctly of type 0, maybe this is a separate feature request.
Problems / Discussion Points
- I'm not sure whether this qualifies as a breaking change, since it introduces a warning for code constructs which compile totally fine at the moment.
- This could be extended for other checks as well (e.g. for the
</<=and>/>=operators) even though this would be pretty edge-casey.
Checklist
My suggestion meets these guidelines:
- (Unsure) This wouldn't be a breaking change in existing TypeScript/JavaScript code
- This wouldn't change the runtime behavior of existing JavaScript code
- This could be implemented without emitting different JS based on the types of the expressions
- This isn't a runtime feature (e.g. library functionality, non-ECMAScript syntax with JavaScript output, etc.)
- This feature would agree with the rest of TypeScript's Design Goals.
Beitragsleitfaden
Erste Schritte
- Lies das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
- Schreib ins Issue, dass du es übernimmst — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
- Forke das Repository und arbeite in einem Branch.
- Öffne einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.
Rechercherichtung
Keine Datei, kein Test und kein Compiler-Einstiegspunkt ist angegeben. Beginne damit, die vorhandenen Diagnosen für Prüfungen auf strikte Gleichheit zu finden, und vergleiche, wie strikte Ungleichheit, typeof und Ausdrücke mit der Länge von Tupeln analysiert werden. Erledigt ist die Aufgabe, wenn Diagnosen für nachweislich immer wahre oder immer falsche !==-Bedingungen hinzugefügt wurden, ohne das erzeugte JavaScript zu ändern.
Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.
Bewertung
- Tech-Stack
- typescript
- Bereich
- compilers
- Issue-Typ
- Feature
- Schwierigkeit
- 5/5
- Geschätzter Aufwand
- Über eine Woche
- Aktivitätsstatus
- Veraltet
- Klarheit
- Größtenteils klar
- Anfängerfreundlichkeit
- 35/100