microsoft / microsoft/TypeScript
Suggestion: Type annotations and interfaces for function declarations
Personne n'a encore pris cette issue.
- Langage dominant
- Go
- Étoiles
- 111k
- Forks
- 14.3k
- Merge moyen
- 2 j 4 h
- PR mergées (30 j)
- 132
Description
Currently in TypeScript, function declarations cannot be typed in the same way as function expressions, e.g. this function can implement the React.FC interface:
interface TestProps {
message: string
}
const Test: React.FC<TestProps> = ({ message }) => {
return <div>{message}</div>
}
But this function can't, at least not directly:
function Test({ message }: TestProps) {
return <div>{message}</div>
}
This becomes more of an issue if you try to add properties to the function object:
Test.defaultProps = {
message: 'hi'
}
It seems that currently the only way to specify the type for the function object in the second example is to create a new variable:
const AliasForTest: React.FC<TestProps> = Test
AliasForTest.defaultProps = {
message: 'hi'
}
This seems like kind of an ugly workaround, so it seems that the current idiom is to just prefer arrow functions for cases like this. But this leads to inconsistency on teams that generally prefer function declarations over const expressions for top-level functions. Personally I find it more readable to see the word "function" for top-level functions rather than seeing "const", which is generally already all over the place in the code. There is even an ESLint rule for teams that share my preference (although I don't think it's been ported to TSLint yet): https://eslint.org/docs/rules/func-style. In any case, I have seen others express similar views and other codebases (including some from Facebook and Apollo, for example) that still prefer the "function" keyword for top-level functions.
However, stylistically it's also a problem if top-level functions are declared some places as declarations (using function) and in other places as expressions (using const). But for those who desire consistency, TypeScript is basically forcing the use of expressions, due to the issues described above.
This is far from being a top priority of course, but I was surprised to see that TypeScript didn't provide some equivalent typing syntax for function declarations. It would be great if this could be considered for a future version (even if far in the future). Thanks for reading!
Guide de contribution
Ouvrir le guide de contribution
Par où commencer
- Lisez l'issue en entier, puis le guide de contribution du projet.
- Signalez en commentaire que vous la prenez — cela évite que deux personnes fassent le même travail.
- Forkez le dépôt et travaillez sur une branche.
- Ouvrez une pull request qui référence le numéro de l'issue.
Piste de recherche
Aucun fichier du dépôt ni aucun test n’est nommé. Commencez par examiner la manière dont TypeScript type actuellement les déclarations de fonctions par rapport aux expressions, puis clarifiez la syntaxe de déclaration souhaitée et son comportement pour des propriétés telles que defaultProps. Le travail est considéré comme terminé lorsqu’une conception est approuvée, ainsi qu’une implémentation et des tests acceptés par les maintainers.
Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.
Évaluation
- Stack technique
- typescript
- Domaine
- compilers
- Type d'issue
- Fonctionnalité
- Difficulté
- 5/5
- Temps estimé
- Plus d'une semaine
- Activité
- À l'abandon
- Clarté
- À clarifier
- Accessibilité débutants
- 25/100