microsoft / microsoft/TypeScript
TS Proposal : "Interface incorrectly extends interface" - sub-interface method overload OR override ?
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Go
- Estrellas
- 111k
- Forks
- 14.4k
- Merge medio
- 1 d 19 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 117
Descripción
TypeScript Version : 2.6.2
The problem
Initial scenario
I encountered the issue yesterday days as I was trying to add some features to one of my interface inheritance chain. The context of this example is just imagined : It is longer than needed to demonstrate the issue, but I wanted a full example to clearly show it needs to be addressed.
So, let's imagine a testing app that should instrument devices : the following is a potential model of the situation :
interface Stream
{
}
interface InputStream
{
}
interface OutputStream
{
}
// interface inheraitance is a great feature
interface IOStream extends InputStream, OutputStream
{
}
interface InterfaceLike
{
}
interface DeviceInterfaceLike extends InterfaceLike
{
init();
}
interface InputDeviceInterfaceLike extends DeviceInterfaceLike
{
input(); // this should word just like the `touch` command
// like if there's and error with the device, it will trigger exception
input(stream: InputStream);
}
interface ScreenDeviceInterfaceLike extends InputDeviceInterfaceLike
{
input(stream: InputStream, coordinates: {x: number, y: number});
}
interface TouchScreenDeviceInterfaceLike extends InputDeviceInterfaceLike
{
input(stream: IOStream, coordinates: {x: number, y: number});
}
Expected behavior :
It should just overload that method in the sub-interfaces.
Actual behavior :
error TS2430: Interface 'ScreenDeviceInterfaceLike' incorrectly extends interface 'InputDeviceInterfaceLike'.
Types of property 'input' are incompatible.
Type '(stream: InputStream, coordinates: { x: number; y: number; }) => any' is not assignable to type '{ (): any; (stream: InputStream): any; }'.
core.ts(73,11): error TS2430: Interface 'TouchScreenDeviceInterfaceLike' incorrectly extends interface 'InputDeviceInterfaceLike'.
Types of property 'input' are incompatible.
Type '(stream: IOStream, coordinates: { x: number; y: number; }) => any' is not assignable to type '{ (): any; (stream: InputStream): any; }'.
18:38:26 - Compilation complete. Watching for file changes.
It requires me to fully copy paste all method signatures in each interface.
interface ScreenDeviceInterfaceLike extends InputDeviceInterfaceLike
{
input(); // this should word just like the `touch` command
// like if there's and error with the device, it will trigger exception
input(stream: InputStream);
input(stream: InputStream, coordinates: {x: number, y: number});
}
interface TouchScreenDeviceInterfaceLike extends InputDeviceInterfaceLike
{
input(); // this should word just like the `touch` command
// like if there's and error with the device, it will trigger exception
input(stream: InputStream);
input(stream: IOStream, coordinates: {x: number, y: number});
}
When you're can have up to (why not) 15 overloads distributed through inheritance chain... It becomes, (yes, you said it) bulky.
Now it is, that the compiler cannot yet figure out when to override the method signatures inherited from parents and when to overload them.
The Proposal
My first thought was to introduce a new keyword just like @ts-nocheck and like.
@override
interface InputDeviceInterfaceLike extends DeviceInterfaceLike
{
@override // to override all definitions from parents
init(istream: InputStream);
}
OR
interface InputDeviceInterfaceLike extends DeviceInterfaceLike
{
@override
{
init(); // to override only this (these) definitions : forget all previous definition but this (these)
}
init(istream: InputStream);
}
Then, the TouchScreenDeviceInterfaceLike interface would become :
interface TouchScreenDeviceInterfaceLike extends InputDeviceInterfaceLike
{
@override // it is now clear that the only way to instrument a touchscreen is to provide a `IOStream` and coordinates (`{x: number, y: number}`)
input(stream: IOStream, coordinates: {x: number, y: number});
}
Furthermore, @overload
While the previous @override is useful when the default behavior is oveloading, we can still define the default behavior to suppress all parent definition WHEN A METHOD IS REDEFINED in subinterface, except when @overload is used. i.e
interface InputDeviceInterfaceLike extends DeviceInterfaceLike
{
// to override all definitions from parents
init(istream: InputStream);
}
OR
interface InputDeviceInterfaceLike extends DeviceInterfaceLike
{
@overload // to overload signatures from parents
init(istream: InputStream);
}
And TouchScreenDeviceInterfaceLike interface can become :
interface TouchScreenDeviceInterfaceLike extends InputDeviceInterfaceLike
{
@overload // to overload signatures from parents
{
init(istream: InputStream); // except this signature... So that it remains only the empty parameter and the below
}
input(stream: IOStream, coordinates: {x: number, y: number});
}
By thinking rigorously, I think the first step would be allow inheriting type to overload methods by default.
= = = = = = UPDATE = = = = = =
I now think it worth to add that by no mean, all through an interface inheritance chain should a method be completely wiped off (deleted, removed)... Not even by @Override! As this may (will) break the core concept of OOP inheritance.
The mechanism is to ensure that only some methods mood (signatures) are handled (accepted) at a given inheritance node.
In other words, if @Override suppresses all signatures, at least one method signature MUST be required.
Guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Línea de trabajo
No se nombran archivos fuente, pruebas ni puntos de entrada del compilador. Empieza revisando la semántica propuesta de herencia de interfaces, sobrecarga y sobrescritura; el trabajo está hecho cuando se haya acordado el comportamiento previsto y se hayan identificado los cambios correspondientes del compilador y las pruebas.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Evaluación
- Stack tecnológico
- typescript
- Área
- compilers
- Tipo de issue
- Nueva funcionalidad
- Dificultad
- 5/5
- Tiempo estimado
- Más de una semana
- Estado de actividad
- Estancado
- Claridad
- Necesita aclaración
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 25/100