microsoft / microsoft/TypeScript
Reconsider if we need to cache file system entries given that we have tweaked triggers for watch
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
Infrastructure
- Dominant language
- Go
- Stars
- 111k
- Forks
- 14.3k
- Avg merge
- 2d 4h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 132
Description
Determine if we still need to cache file system entries in the directory or non caching has similar performance given that watch triggers and invokes have changed since the cached directory structure host implementation
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by examining the cached directory structure host implementation and the current watch triggers and invokes. Compare cached and non-cached file-system entry performance, then document whether the cache is still needed and what behavior should change.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- typescript
- Domain
- performance, tooling
- Issue type
- Refactor
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100