microsoft / microsoft/PowerPlatform-DataverseClient-Python
tables.update_column / update_columns: update existing column constraints (retrieve -> PUT + @odata.type) -- no metadata-write path exists today
Dieses Issue hat noch niemand übernommen.
- Vorherrschende Sprache
- Python
- Sterne
- 60
- Forks
- 23
- Ø Merge
- 13 Std. 53 Min.
- Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
- 3
Beschreibung
Summary
client.tables can create, add_columns, and remove_columns, but there is no way to update an existing column's definition -- MaxLength, MinValue/MaxValue, RequiredLevel, DisplayName, Format, etc. Today a caller who needs to widen a text column or change a required level must drop to the raw Web API PUT EntityDefinitions({id})/Attributes({id}) and hand-build the payload, including the derived @odata.type discriminator.
This is also the only place the counter-intuitive PUT-not-PATCH metadata-update contract is exposed to users. Metadata updates go over PUT with merge semantics (partial payloads are honored), which reads like PATCH behavior on the PUT verb. The right fix is not a platform verb change (that is a long pole) -- it is to hide the verb inside the SDK so users never choose it.
Context: parity with the .NET modern client
Microsoft.PowerPlatform.Dataverse.Client.ServiceClient never hits this, because it rides the Organization Service message contracts (Execute(new UpdateAttributeRequest { Attribute = new StringAttributeMetadata { MaxLength = 4000 } })) -- a typed message, no HTTP verb. The Python SDK is Web-API-bound and cannot borrow those contracts, so it should own the retrieve -> modify -> PUT (+ @odata.type) sequence internally to give the same UX (typed fields in, no verb visible).
Proposed change (backward-compatible)
Add update_column (+ update_columns) that accepts the same dict override schema proposed in #194, so create and update share one spec shape:
client.tables.update_column("cfb_CustomerFeedback", "cfb_Comment",
{"max_length": 4000, "display_name": "Customer Comment"})
Internally: GET the existing typed attribute -> apply overrides -> PUT back with the correct derived @odata.type. Never expose PUT/PATCH/@odata.type to the caller.
Touchpoints
data/_odata.py-- new_update_attribute(retrieve-then-PUTwith@odata.type); reuse_odata_base.py::_attribute_payloadoverride-building from #194.operations/tables.py+aio/operations/async_tables.py-- newupdate_column/update_columns.- Unit tests: override application + correct verb /
@odata.typeon the outbound request. - README + CHANGELOG per repo maintenance rules.
Acceptance
update_column(..., {"max_length": 4000})issues aPUTtoEntityDefinitions({id})/Attributes({id})withMaxLength: 4000and the correct derived@odata.type.- Caller never passes a verb or
@odata.type. - Depends on / shares the override-spec schema from #194.
Related
- #194 -- create-time column constraints (in progress).
- microsoft/Dataverse-skills#119 -- documents the raw Web API metadata contract this method replaces.
Beitragsleitfaden
Erste Schritte
- Lies das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
- Schreib ins Issue, dass du es übernimmst — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
- Forke das Repository und arbeite in einem Branch.
- Öffne einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.
Rechercherichtung
Beginne mit data/_odata.py und _odata_base.py::_attribute_payload und prüfe anschließend die Tabellenoperationen in operations/tables.py und aio/operations/async_tables.py. Verifiziere die Anwendung des Overrides und die ausgehende PUT-Anfrage in Unit-Tests, einschließlich des abgeleiteten @odata.type; aktualisiere die README und CHANGELOG wie erforderlich. Bestätige, dass die Implementierung das Override-Schema aus #194 verwendet und Verb sowie Discriminator intern hält.
Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.
Bewertung
- Tech-Stack
- python
- Bereich
- api, backend
- Issue-Typ
- Feature
- Schwierigkeit
- 4/5
- Geschätzter Aufwand
- 3-5 Tage
- Aktivitätsstatus
- Aktiv
- Klarheit
- Klar beschrieben
- Anfängerfreundlichkeit
- 68/100