micro-ROS / micro-ROS/system_modes
[QST] time comsuming and blocking of lifecycle management.
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- C++
- Stars
- 45
- Forks
- 13
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Why is so slow of changing lifecycle state of a node.
there is a test log below, from the data, there will cost at less than 4s, to change the state of lifecycle nodes!
```sh
zs@zs-vm-2204:~/zs_ws/ga_ros$ ros2 service call /actuation/change_state lifecycle_msgs/ChangeState "{transition: {id: 1, label: configure}}"
waiting for service to become available...
requester: making request: lifecycle_msgs.srv.ChangeState_Request(transition=lifecycle_msgs.msg.Transition(id=1, label='configure'))
response:
lifecycle_msgs.srv.ChangeState_Response(success=True)
zs@zs-vm-2204:~/zs_ws/ga_ros$ time ros2 service call /actuation/change_state lifecycle_msgs/ChangeState "{transition: {id: 1, label: configure}}"
waiting for service to become available...
requester: making request: lifecycle_msgs.srv.ChangeState_Request(transition=lifecycle_msgs.msg.Transition(id=1, label='configure'))
response:
lifecycle_msgs.srv.ChangeState_Response(success=True)
real 0m2.185s
user 0m0.459s
sys 0m0.086s
zs@zs-vm-2204:~/zs_ws/ga_ros$ time ros2 service call /actuation/change_state lifecycle_msgs/ChangeState "{transition: {id: 1, label: configure}}"
waiting for service to become available...
requester: making request: lifecycle_msgs.srv.ChangeState_Request(transition=lifecycle_msgs.msg.Transition(id=1, label='configure'))
response:
lifecycle_msgs.srv.ChangeState_Response(success=True)
real 0m1.613s
user 0m0.389s
sys 0m0.075s
zs@zs-vm-2204:~/zs_ws/ga_ros$ time ros2 service call /actuation/change_state lifecycle_msgs/ChangeState "{transition: {id: 3, label: activate}}"
requester: making request: lifecycle_msgs.srv.ChangeState_Request(transition=lifecycle_msgs.msg.Transition(id=3, label='activate'))
response:
lifecycle_msgs.srv.ChangeState_Response(success=True)
real 0m0.572s
user 0m0.349s
sys 0m0.094s
zs@zs-vm-2204:~/zs_ws/ga_ros$ time ros2 service call /actuation/change_mode system_modes_msgs/ChangeMode "{mode_name: 'LEFT'}"
requester: making request: system_modes_msgs.srv.ChangeMode_Request(mode_name='LEFT')
response:
system_modes_msgs.srv.ChangeMode_Response(success=True)
real 0m0.815s
user 0m0.590s
sys 0m0.130s
zs@zs-vm-2204:~/zs_ws/ga_ros$ ros2 service call /actuation/change_mode system_modes_msgs/ChangeMode "{mode_name: 'RIGHT'}"
waiting for service to become available...
requester: making request: system_modes_msgs.srv.ChangeMode_Request(mode_name='RIGHT')
response:
system_modes_msgs.srv.ChangeMode_Response(success=True)
zs@zs-vm-2204:~/zs_ws/ga_ros$ time ros2 service call /actuation/change_state lifecycle_msgs/ChangeState "{transition: {id: 1, label: configure}}"
waiting for service to become available...
requester: making request: lifecycle_msgs.srv.ChangeState_Request(transition=lifecycle_msgs.msg.Transition(id=1, label='configure'))
response:
lifecycle_msgs.srv.ChangeState_Response(success=True)
real 0m3.286s
user 0m0.377s
sys 0m0.086s
zs@zs-vm-2204:~/zs_ws/ga_ros$ time ros2 service call /actuation/change_state lifecycle_msgs/ChangeState "{transition: {id: 3, label: activate}}"
waiting for service to become available...
requester: making request: lifecycle_msgs.srv.ChangeState_Request(transition=lifecycle_msgs.msg.Transition(id=3, label='activate'))
response:
lifecycle_msgs.srv.ChangeState_Response(success=True)
real 0m1.851s
user 0m0.608s
sys 0m0.188s
```
I created a similar issue here too https://github.com/ros2/ros2cli/issues/779
Thanks.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Reproduce the reported /actuation/change_state and /actuation/change_mode timings in the system_modes ROS 2 setup, then compare the behavior with the related ros2cli issue 779. The report names no source files or tests; done requires identifying the cause of the multi-second lifecycle delay and providing evidence that the delay is resolved or explained.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- cpp
- Domain
- robotics
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100