mesonbuild / mesonbuild/meson-python

Dynamic control over ninja parallelism, or generic dynamic features

Aperta
#416 16 commenti 1 reazione 0 assegnatari Vedi su GitHub

Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.

enhancement
Lingua principale
Python
Stelle
180
Fork
93
Merge medio
2g 7h
PR unite (30g)
18

Descrizione

First the specific feature we need in SciPy: set the number of parallel compile jobs for `ninja` to equal the number of available physical cores (`n_phys`). We have a number of reports about the `ninja` default setting, which is `2*n_phys + 2`, either giving out of memory errors or even crashing the build machine outright:
- https://github.com/scipy/scipy/issues/17941 is a report for a Chromebook running Debian (with a very good description of the problem and background info)
- https://github.com/scipy/scipy/issues/18443 reports the issue on multiple Windows machines, with a regular 8-core CPU and 16 GB RAM
- https://github.com/ninja-build/ninja/issues/2187 is a/the relevant upstream issue

For local development this was not difficult to address (see https://github.com/scipy/scipy/pull/18451), because SciPy has a developer interface where we can run custom code before invoking Meson. However, for `pip install` & co, there is no way to do that currently. So a user who may be installing some random package that happens to depend on SciPy may get crash or hang that we can't easily prevent. Hardcoding, say, `-j4` is not great - there is no setting that works on low-end machines without throwing away lots of performance on high-end machines. The optimal settings seems to always be close to the number of physical cores.

So, ideally there would be a hook that `meson-python` exposes to package authors which can run arbitrary Python code to then set `compile-args` with.

I also see a more general pattern here, with gh-159 being another example of the need to execute code first and then set some build-related property (the package version in that case). It's a very similar case, and rather than a specific solution for each of these two problems, we may consider a general mechanism to deal with this kind of thing. Maybe a single Python function to execute, which must return a dict containing a pre-determined set of keys, including `version`, `compile-args` and the other `*-args` knobs.

Thoughts?

Guida per i contributori

Nessuna guida per i contributori indicizzata per questo repository

Come iniziare

  1. Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
  2. Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
  3. Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
  4. Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.

Direzione di ricerca

Inizia con l’interfaccia per sviluppatori esistente di meson-python e il SciPy PR 18451 collegato, quindi confronta il caso d’uso della versione gh-159 e l’upstream ninja issue. Il lavoro sarà completato quando sarà stato deciso e documentato un meccanismo per eseguire Python definito dal pacchetto prima del build e impostare proprietà supportate come compile-args e version.

Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.

Valutazione

Stack tecnologico
python
Ambito
build-system, tooling
Tipo di issue
Funzionalità
Difficoltà
5/5
Tempo stimato
Più di una settimana
Stato di attività
Ferma
Chiarezza
Abbastanza chiara
Idoneità per principianti
25/100

Ricevi le nuove issue nella tua casella

Un breve riepilogo di issue GitHub adatte ai principianti.