[FUTURE] Write a comparison benchmark using `worker_threads` module
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
- Lenguaje dominante
- C++
- Estrellas
- 74
- Forks
- 9
- Métricas de merge de PR
- Sin PR fusionados en 30 d
Descripción
v10.5.0 has a new `worker_threads` module that allows pure JS functions to run on a separate thread. The node-cpp-skel demonstrates doing this type of thing using C++, but the `worker_threads` module allows for it in pure JS. (https://nodejs.org/en/blog/release/v10.5.0/)
It would be useful to try to write an 🍏 to 🍏 (or as close as we can get) comparison benchmark of doing the same work in C++ threads vs JS threads using `worker_threads`. We would try to answer questions like:
- 🍒 Is performance of passing data (#69, #67) similar in with `worker_threads` vs using libuv directly in C++?
- 🍊 When combined (overhead of thread queuing, passing data to the thread, doing compute, getting data back) which approach is faster?
We could get at 🍒 by writing a benchmark that passes the same, large data, and does no compute in the thread. Instead that thread could just sleep for N seconds.
We could get at 🍊 by passing the same data and doing the same (as close as possible) compute, perhaps a Fibonacci (or some kind of classical compute intensive workload).
----
Depending on the results we will want to update https://github.com/mapbox/cpp/blob/master/node-cpp.md#why-create-a-node-addon which says:
> Why create a node addon?
> To port a C++ project to Node to expose a new interface for the tool (like Mapnik & Node Mapnik)
> Improve performance at scale where Node becomes the bottleneck (i.e. concurrency)
If JS is just as fast as C++, then we'll want to update that doc to mention `worker_threads` as a more ideal solution than writing a node addon to access the thread pool. If `JS/worker_threads` is slower than C++ then we'll probably want to add details to that doc about what types of workloads or performance situations we'd want to use C++ and which we'd want to consider `JS/worker_threads`
/cc @mapbox/core-tech
Guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Línea de trabajo
Comienza revisando los ejemplos de node-cpp-skel y la sección node-cpp.md enlazada en el issue, junto con la información de la versión de worker_threads a la que se hace referencia. Define benchmarks comparables de workers en C++ y JavaScript para la transferencia de datos y el cómputo, y usa sus resultados para determinar si node-cpp.md necesita actualizar sus indicaciones.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Evaluación
- Stack tecnológico
- cpp, javascript, node.js
- Área
- documentation, performance
- Tipo de issue
- Nueva funcionalidad
- Dificultad
- 5/5
- Tiempo estimado
- Más de una semana
- Estado de actividad
- Estancado
- Claridad
- Bastante claro
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 25/100