MacAdmins python3, included modules and compatibility
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
- 主要语言
- Shell
- 星标
- 257
- 派生
- 29
- PR 合并指标
- 30 天内没有已合并 PR
描述
For quite sometime it was the case that whilst python3.10 was supported by MunkiReport-PHP, 3.11 was not.
See - https://www.kevinmcox.com/2023/06/munkireport-python-3-and-php-8/
As a result I stuck with 3.10 releases and had no problems. I do however now see the following on the MunkiReport-PHP wiki so will try and remember to setup a test install to see if this is still the case.
See - https://github.com/munkireport/munkireport-php/wiki/Python-updates
I would like to get more up to date so as to remove potential issues regarding the pending end of Rosetta support and resulting installation issues.
Another reason I stuck with 3.10 version was that I was able to confirm that as standard it had included all the Python modules I needed not only for MunkiReport-PHP but other projects like Okta Device Trust. Okta's own documentation at the time required running their scripts which required command line developer tools to be installed to download a build a python installation and download a build specific modules. It fortunately turned out that the pre-built MacAdmins 3.10 install had all those modules as standard.
Note: a simple way to determine what modules are installed is as follows.
- Install python
- Run the command `/usr/local/bin/python3 -c "help('modules')"` in Terminal.app - the path can be altered to test alternative installations of python but this path is the one used by the MacAdmins pkg
I have the following questions regarding the current status of the MacAdmins python pkg.
1. Is the current installer for 3.14.5 a fully 'universal' pkg meaning it not only contains versions of Python that are native for both Apple Silicon and Intel Macs, but also that the installer itself is properly built to advertise this fact? See open issue https://github.com/macadmins/python/issues/85 It maybe this will turn out to not be pessary, I see that the plan is to drop Intel support in future releases and logically you will then not make it universal and not trigger this, An Autopkg munki recipe could then label newer releases as having only an Arm architecture and Munki will not try to install future updates on Intel but being the Installer pkg is labelled also as Arm only will not trigger any Rosetta issue.
2. Does the current 3.14.5 pkg of Python have at least the same set of modules that 3.10 has/had?
3. Would it be possible to get an additional module added (if not already included) to the next Python build? It could be helpful to have the Cyptography module included.
贡献指南
这个仓库没有索引到贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
调研方向
从 Python 更新 wiki、issue #85 和当前的 3.14.5 package 开始;使用 `/usr/local/bin/python3 -c "help('modules')"` 检查其 modules。完成标准是确定该 package 的 universal 状态,将其 modules 与 3.10 进行比较,并确定是否应包含 Cryptography。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
评估
- 技术栈
- macos, python
- 领域
- build-system, operating-systems
- Issue 类型
- 功能
- 难度
- 4/5
- 预计耗时
- 3-5 天
- 活跃度
- 冷清
- 描述清晰度
- 需要澄清
- 新手友好度
- 38/100