loopbackio / loopbackio/loopback-next
OpenAPI generator use case: recurring vs. one-time
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
- Lenguaje dominante
- TypeScript
- Estrellas
- 5.1k
- Forks
- 1.1k
- Merge medio
- 2 d 21 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 27
Descripción
Suggestion
The current OpenAPI generator seems like it's meant to be used once, upfront, to scaffold code.
My suggestion is to (also/instead) support the use case where you run the generator regularly as part of your build, and don't even check in the generated files. (this is how I generally prefer to use code generators)
Was this considered in the design of the current generator? Is it possible to achieve something like this with LoopBack today?
Details
I'm starting a new project, and I expect to gradually evolve the schema over a couple years. Here's how I want it to work when a developer is updating application code to account for changes in the schema:
- pull down the new schema
- run the application build (this runs the code generator, replacing all the generated files)
- application code that references the generated files now has TypeScript errors, showing you where your attention is needed. (follow the squiggles)
Other desirable properties of code generators:
- Generated files have a recognizable, git -ignorable ending (e.g.
.gen.ts) - There's a big scary header comment at the top saying "THIS IS A GENERATED FILE, DO NOT EDIT"
- Ideally the generated code is formatted, at generation time, according to the project's prettier config. (for example, see graphql-code-generator)
- You never need to make a change in a generated file. Instead you make changes in the generator's input. (e.g. the OpenAPI schema or in the generator configuration)
- Because the generated file is unversioned and replaced wholesale, you're never asked to resolve a merge conflict between the new template and your project-specific changes.
Alternatives
- Is Loopback's OpenAPI generator built on top of other libraries or tools that I might be able to use separately?
- Do you know of other node.js web frameworks that might align with this philosophy? I don't need all the features loopback provides, I'm just hoping to make my OpenAPI schema the source of truth for endpoint declarations, input/output types, etc.
Guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Línea de trabajo
Comienza con la documentación enlazada de OpenAPI generator e inspecciona cómo ejecuta actualmente LoopBack el generador. Compara ese comportamiento con el workflow solicitado para builds recurrentes, incluidos los archivos generados sin versionar, los marcadores de archivos generados, el formateo y el feedback de TypeScript. Se consideraría terminado cuando exista un diseño acordado y una forma compatible de usar el generador desde los builds de la aplicación.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Evaluación
- Stack tecnológico
- node.js, openapi, typescript
- Área
- api, backend-api-design
- Tipo de issue
- Nueva funcionalidad
- Dificultad
- 5/5
- Tiempo estimado
- Más de una semana
- Estado de actividad
- Estancado
- Claridad
- Necesita aclaración
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 20/100