flaky repo.reset() behavior
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
- 主要语言
- Python
- 星标
- 1.7k
- 派生
- 408
- 平均合并
- 2 天 57 分钟
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 7
描述
This issue is about repo.reset() not seeming to work reliably 100% of the time.
I have some CI tests that modify a file in a non-bare repo, commit the change to a branch, and then call repo.reset() with GIT_RESET_HARD to restore to a different commit. After calling reset, to confirm that the reset was successful, the test creates a new Repository object and checks the repository's status using repo.status(). Occasionally (but very rarely), the status check comes back showing the original file still as WT_MODIFIED. A subsequent call to repo.diff() confirms the difference in the file. Is there something pygit2 is or isn't doing that could cause reset() to behave flakily like this? Or is libgit2 the more likely culprit?
This is using pygit2 1.2.0. I can try upgrading, but is there a reason to think this would be fixed in a newer version (e.g. a known issue that was fixed)? I haven't found anything like this in pygit2 or libgit2's issue tracker or release notes.
贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
调研方向
首先使用 pygit2 1.2.0 重现已报告的 CI 流程:在非 bare repository 中修改并提交一个文件,使用 GIT_RESET_HARD 调用 repo.reset(),然后创建一个新的 Repository,并比较 repo.status() 与 repo.diff()。完成的标准是确定间歇性出现的 WT_MODIFIED 结果源自 pygit2 还是 libgit2,并记录原因或已确认的修复路径。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
评估
- 技术栈
- git, python
- 领域
- devtools
- Issue 类型
- 缺陷
- 难度
- 4/5
- 预计耗时
- 3-5 天
- 活跃度
- 停滞
- 描述清晰度
- 需要澄清
- 新手友好度
- 35/100