libgit2 / libgit2/libgit2sharp
[RFC] Batched low level index operations
還沒有人認領這個 Issue。
- 主要語言
- C#
- 星號
- 3.5k
- 分支
- 925
- PR 合併指標
- 30 天內沒有已合併 PR
描述
In the light of https://github.com/libgit2/libgit2sharp/pull/907, I was wondering if we should take this approach one step further.
Each call to repo.Stage() will
- Perform a diff between the working directory and the Index in order to determine what additions/removals should be promoted to the staging area
- Perform additions/deletions in the in memory Index
- Eventually persist the in memory Index to the disk
Each call to repo.Index.Add() (or Remove()) will
- Perform an addition (or a deletion) in the in memory Index
- Persist the in memory Index to the disk
As such, invoking repo.Index.Add() or repo.Index.Remove() will be more efficient than a call to repo.Stage().
We want to allow the user to switch to the command line git.git, between each call to LibGit2Sharp, and find the repository in a coherent state. This is the requirement that compels us to persist the in-memory Index at the very end of each Index related method.
However, would clients of the library require to perform many sequential calls to the lower level methods repo.Index.Add()|Remove(), the Index would be persisted as part of each call. Which may not be very efficient.
Considering this above, would a need for an IndexUpdater exist?
We may expose something like in the Index type:
public virtual void Update(params Action<IndexUpdater>[] actions)
which would allow the client to write such code:
repo.Index.Update(i => i.Add(path), i => i.Remove(otherPath))
Or even some more elaborate custom thingies such as
private void StageAllAdditionsRemovalsAndModifications(IRepository repo)
{
// Compare the Workdir against the Index without attempting at detecting Copies/Renames
var changes = repo.Diff.Compare<TreeChanges>(null, true,
compareOptions: new CompareOptions { Similarity = SimilarityOptions.None });
repo.Index.Update(i =>
{
// We first clean the Index from unwanted entries...
foreach (TreeEntryChanges treeEntryChanges in changes
.Where(tec => tec.Status == ChangeKind.Deleted))
{
i.Remove(treeEntryChanges.Path);
}
// ...then insert in the Index the additions/modifications.
foreach (TreeEntryChanges treeEntryChanges in changes
.Where(tec => tec.Status == ChangeKind.Added || tec.Status == ChangeKind.Modified))
{
i.Add(treeEntryChanges.Path);
}
});
}
And allow us to only persist the Index only once, when all the actions have been performed by the IndexUpdater.
Thoughts?
貢獻指南
從這裡開始
- 先讀完整個 Issue,再讀專案的貢獻指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言說明你要接手 —— 這能避免兩個人做同樣的事。
- Fork 儲存庫,在一個分支上完成修改。
- 送出 Pull Request,並在描述裡引用這個 Issue 編號。
研究方向
先閱讀 PR #907 以及現有的 Index.Add() 和 Index.Remove() 入口點。將提議的 Index.Update/IndexUpdater API 與「repository 在呼叫之間保持一致」的要求進行比較;要視為完成,需要一個經 maintainer 核准的設計和明確的實作範圍,而本 RFC 尚未提供這些內容。
由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。
評估
- 技術堆疊
- csharp, git
- 領域
- backend-api-design
- Issue 類型
- 功能
- 難度
- 5/5
- 預估耗時
- 一週以上
- 活躍度
- 停滯
- 描述清晰度
- 需要釐清
- 新手友好度
- 25/100