libgit2 / libgit2/libgit2sharp

CommitFilter / CommitSortStrategies Understanding

未关闭
#1,145 0 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看

还没有人认领这个 Issue。

主要语言
C#
星标
3.5k
派生
925
PR 合并指标
30 天内没有已合并 PR

描述

I am trying to understand what "CommitSortStrategies" is actually doing to the commit collections that I am getting back and am just looking for clarification if this is correct.

Git, by default (cmd line app), are shown in reverse chronological order, so:

  • git (default sort) == CommitFilter/SortBy of (Undefined)
  • git --reverse != CommitFilter/SortBy of Reverse
  • git --reverse == CommitFilter/SortBy of Reverse | Time
  • git --topo-order == CommitFilter/SortBy of Topological
  • git --reverse --topo-order == CommitFilter/SortBy of Reverse | Topological
  • git --______ ?= CommitFilter/SortBy of None
  • CommitFilter/SortBy of None != CommitFilter/SortBy of (Undefined)

Is that list correct/complete?

(FYI: I have a multi-million object repo with millions of refs and have reverted to shelling to git to get the commit lists between cross-merge branches as I can not get a direct match between libgit2's ls-trees and gits, my head hurts....)

BTW: What order does CommitSortStrategies.None follow? Based on ref creation order on the file-system, maybe?

A sample for a future reader:
# Note: Piping to head as you can not use -n <number>, --max-count=<number> as that is applied before commit ordering
git log HEAD..master --format="%ci %h %s" --reverse | head -10

So based upon the equivalence list above, in libgit2sharp this becomes:

var filter = new CommitFilter {
    SortBy = CommitSortStrategies.Reverse | CommitSortStrategies.Time,
    Since = master,  // determined by a prior repo.Lookup<Tree>
    Until = head, // determined by a prior repo.Lookup<Tree>                    
};
repo.Commits.QueryBy(filter).Take(10);

贡献指南

打开贡献指南

从这里开始

  1. 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
  2. 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
  3. Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
  4. 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。

调研方向

从 issue 中引用的入口点 CommitFilter、CommitSortStrategies 和 QueryBy 开始,然后将它们的行为与列出的 git 命令示例进行比较。记录每个提出的等价关系是否正确,并明确 CommitSortStrategies.None 的排序语义;当这些问题都有权威解释时,即视为完成。

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

评估

技术栈
csharp, git
领域
devtools
Issue 类型
文档
难度
3/5
预计耗时
1-2 天
活跃度
停滞
描述清晰度
需要澄清
新手友好度
25/100

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。