Case studies/user logos

I've been talking to a lot of JuMP users recently. I think we could do a lot better with advertising the people that are happily using JuMP. Making a list of people that I've talked to recently

## Academia

* DTU Denmark (Thomas Stidsen, et al, https://orbit.dtu.dk/en/persons/jalal-kazempour)
* University of Setif Algeria (Bouras Ikram)
* Ecole des Ponts
* Mines Paris
* Nantes
* President of ROADEF (https://homepages.laas.fr/sungueve/)
* TUDelft (https://www.tudelft.nl/en/eemcs/the-faculty/departments/software-technology/algorithmics/projects/nextgenopt)
* UW Madison

## Government

* LANL
* NREL (Sienna, Reopt)
* ANL
* SINTEF
* CSIRO
* NZ EA (https://www.emi.ea.govt.nz/Wholesale/Tools/JADE)

## Industry

* AtOptima
* Renault (https://github.com/LouisBouvier/InventoryRoutingLNS.jl, https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.00412)

## Energy system models

* GenX https://github.com/GenXProject/GenX
* Sienna https://www.nrel.gov/analysis/sienna.html
* AnyMOD.jl https://github.com/leonardgoeke/AnyMOD.jl
* SpinneOpt.jl https://github.com/spine-tools/SpineOpt.jl
* @sstroemer's stuff: https://live.juliacon.org/talk/C7DFSF (Is this the same as NextGenOpt?)
* E4ST https://pretalx.com/juliacon2023/talk/LUVDCY/
* https://www.tudelft.nl/en/eemcs/the-faculty/departments/software-technology/algorithmics/projects/nextgenopt

The issue names no files, tests, or entry points. Start by reviewing the existing jump.dev site structure and the issue's proposed user list, then determine where this content belongs and how logos or case studies should be presented. Done should mean the selected users are represented on the site with verified details and links.

Escrita pelo modelo de indexação a partir do texto da issue.