jump-dev / jump-dev/MultiObjectiveAlgorithms.jl
Instances for testing
- Lenguaje dominante
- Julia
- Estrellas
- 87
- Forks
- 10
- Merge medio
- 25 min
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 1
Descripción
Issue #105 has demonstrated that we need better testing of the algorithms.
One approach is to hand-craft tests. But that's pretty slow and limiting.
It'd be better if we could have a set of instances in a file format with a corresponding set of efficient solutions that we could check against.
Here's a library of instances: https://github.com/vOptSolver/vOptLib
It doesn't use a standardized file format, and it doesn't have solutions. But we could translate everything into JuMP and then into `.mof.json` (https://jump.dev/MathOptFormat), and then compare the various algorithms against each other.
The output would be: a standardized set of instances and a set of solutions :smile: which seems like a useful thing for the community.
I'm very open to discussions for ideas on this...
Guía de contribución
No hay ninguna guía de contribución indexada para este repositorio
Línea de trabajo
Start by reviewing issue #105 and the vOptLib instance library, then examine how those instances could be represented through JuMP and MathOptFormat. Done means the project has a standardized set of instances, corresponding efficient solutions, and a way to compare the algorithms against them.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Evaluación
- Stack tecnológico
- julia
- Área
- testing-qa
- Tipo de issue
- Nueva funcionalidad
- Dificultad
- 5/5
- Tiempo estimado
- Más de una semana
- Estado de actividad
- Estancado
- Claridad
- Bastante claro
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 30/100