jaredly / jaredly/example-reason-codemod
Detect a function of a given module?
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- OCaml
- Stars
- 3
- Forks
- 0
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Thanks for creating these codemod utils and example! 🙂 Really cool.
I'm exploring if I could use this codemod for the migrations of BuckleScript `Js` modules proposed in https://github.com/BuckleScript/bucklescript/issues/2975. I wonder how I could approach the detection of usages of some specific functions in `Js.X` modules:
If I use syntactic analysis (e.g. use `Pexp_ident` to match against the function names) it might not be effective in all cases, for example the function can be called with `Js.Array.map` or just `map` if the `Js.Array` module has been opened before.
There is `getExprType` which is awesome but it just works at the type level, so I wouldn't know which function has been called, only the type of the expression.
Is there an approach that I'm missing to do this kind of detection in an accurate way?
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Review the codemod utils and example, then investigate how Pexp_ident and getExprType handle calls such as Js.Array.map and an opened-module map. Compare whether the available syntax and type information can identify the called function accurately. Done means documenting a reliable detection approach or the limitation that prevents it.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- ocaml
- Domain
- tooling
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100