Feedback on Ndarray/Ndarray-linalg (from Reddit)
まだ誰も着手していません。
評価
- 難易度
- 5/5
- 見積もり時間
- 1週間以上
- 初心者へのやさしさ
- 25/100
- issue の種類
- 機能追加
- 明瞭さ
- 説明が足りない
- 活発さ
- 停滞
- 領域
- data, documentation
調査の方向性
Start by reading the linked Reddit thread and the existing ndarray for NumPy users document, then review how ndarray and ndarray-stats divide responsibilities. The feedback covers documentation, indexing, crate organization, and Rust views versus references; done would require turning these broad points into a clearly scoped, maintainable change.
索引モデルが issue の本文から書いたものです。
説明
Some interesting feedback on using ndarray and ndarray-linalg to port a numerical routine from Python to Rust: Reddit thread
Actionable highlights:
- NumPy to ndarray documentation
The ndarray for numpy users document was a tremendous help. I really appreciate it and all the work the developers have put into making it.
I'd love to see the numpy-to-ndarray docs expanded. I know that the developers of ndarray are trying to make most function calls as general as possible, but I might request that some more of these general functions get added to the ndarray for numpy users document (either how to implement them or where to go for the implementation). For instance: the max/min and argmax/argmin functions.
- Crate organization
On the topic of max/argmax functions, I implemented my own but I just saw that ndarray-stats has them. I am a bit confused why/how the ndarray and the semi-associated subcrates are being partitioned. For instance, the other stats functions in ndarray-stats seem pretty high level and make sense. However, the "max" function seems like something that should either be implemented in the ndarray crate itself (like the "sum" function/method has been) or "max" should be part of another "ndarray-lowlevelmath" crate.
- Array indexing
Not being able to slice/index ndarrays with other ndarrays was a bit of a pain point. It's mentioned that you can't do that with ndarray on the ndarray for numpy users document. Are there plans to implement indexing by array?
- Best practice wrt views/references/etc.
I'm not sure how / when to use views of arrays and when to use references. This is likely my lack of experience with Rust, but I don't know what the pros and cons of each are or when I should write a function that takes an array view versus a reference to an array. I haven't seen any tutorial information on this (so if anyone could point me to a document I'd be super appreciative).
Sweet closure 😛
My project that uses Python will really be improved greatly by switching to Rust and I'm thrilled that so much work has been done on the ndarray and associated crates in the last year that is enabling my work!
- 主要言語
- Rust
- スター
- 4.3k
- フォーク
- 391
- PR マージ指標
- 30日以内にマージされた PR はありません
コントリビューションガイド
このリポジトリのコントリビューションガイドは索引されていません
はじめの一歩
- issue を最後まで読み、次にプロジェクトのコントリビューションガイドを読みます。
- 着手することを issue にコメントします — 二人が同じ作業をするのを防げます。
- リポジトリをフォークし、ブランチを切って変更します。
- issue 番号を参照したプルリクエストを送ります。
rust-ndarray/ndarray のほかの issue
-
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 72/100
rust-ndarray/ndarray#1612 · コメント 1 件 ·
-
難易度 4/5 3〜5日 初心者へのやさしさ 48/100
rust-ndarray/ndarray#1617 · コメント 1 件 ·
-
bug good first issue
難易度 3/5 1〜2日 初心者へのやさしさ 68/100
rust-ndarray/ndarray#1615 · コメント 1 件 ·
-
難易度 4/5 3〜5日 初心者へのやさしさ 48/100
rust-ndarray/ndarray#1610 ·
-
難易度 3/5 1〜2日 初心者へのやさしさ 72/100
rust-ndarray/ndarray#1609 ·
rust-ndarray/ndarray の issue をすべて見る
似ている issue
-
risk:low runtime status:in-progress type:test
難易度 1/5 1時間未満 初心者へのやさしさ 92/100
zeroclaw-labs/zeroclaw#11023 ·
-
good first issue refactor
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 72/100
-
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 84/100
EricSpencer00/Resilient#4835 · コメント 1 件 ·
-
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 74/100
bisq-network/bisq-musig#204 ·
-
agent:ready documentation
難易度 2/5 1〜3時間 初心者へのやさしさ 88/100
cesarferreira/stax#890 ·