Thread pools behaving oddly with `max_queue` and `remaining_capacity`

Aperta
#684 6 commenti 0 reazioni 0 assegnatari Vedi su GitHub

Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.

Valutazione

Difficoltà
4/5
Tempo stimato
3-5 giorni
Idoneità per principianti
35/100
Tipo di issue
Bug
Chiarezza
Da chiarire
Stato di attività
Ferma
Stack tecnologico
ruby
Ambito
backend

Direzione di ricerca

Start with the ThreadPoolExecutor configuration and the reported entry point in lib/concurrent/executor/ruby_executor_service.rb, then inspect the synchronization paths in lib/concurrent/synchronization/mri_lockable_object.rb and related executor code. Reproduce the script and compare max_queue, remaining_capacity, rejection, and wait_for_termination behavior with the documented expectations; done means the intended behavior is established and covered by an appropriate test or documentation update.

Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.

Descrizione

question

We're in need for a thread pool that has a maximum number of parallel threads, no queue and fails if too many threads are added. We also need to be able to detect how many threads are "free" at a given time.

We've tried almost all of the ThreadPool and ThreadPoolExecutor classes but can't get it to work:

require 'concurrent'

pool = Concurrent::ThreadPoolExecutor.new(
  min_threads: 0,
  max_threads: 5,
  max_queue: 0,
  fallback_policy: :abort,
  auto_terminate: false
)

6.times do
  pool.post { sleep 5 }
  puts pool.remaining_capacity
end

pool.wait_for_termination

If we interpret the documentation right, this should create a thread pool with 0 threads at start that can grow up to 5 threads which are handled in parallel. If all 5 threads are occupied, posting new work units should result in an exception. There should be no additional queue. We'd also expect remaining_capacity to drop by 1 each time something has been posted and the previous threads are still busy.

The output of the above script:

-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1

Expected would be:

4
3
2
1
0
=> EXCEPTION

Did we interpret the documentation wrong and how can we achieve what we need? We're also need to be able to detect the number of idle threads so that we can post the right number of work units to it.

On a side-note: The above example stops with a number of exceptions like the following:

/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/2.4.0/gems/concurrent-ruby-1.0.5/lib/concurrent/synchronization/mri_lockable_object.rb:43:in `sleep': No live threads left. Deadlock? (fatal)
6 threads, 6 sleeps current:0x00007fa6936e27d0 main thread:0x00007fa6937044c0
* #<Thread:0x00007fa69487f0b8 sleep_forever>
   rb_thread_t:0x00007fa6937044c0 native:0x00007fff7b53e000 int:1
   /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/2.4.0/gems/concurrent-ruby-1.0.5/lib/concurrent/synchronization/mri_lockable_object.rb:43:in `sleep'
   /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/2.4.0/gems/concurrent-ruby-1.0.5/lib/concurrent/synchronization/mri_lockable_object.rb:43:in `wait'
   /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/2.4.0/gems/concurrent-ruby-1.0.5/lib/concurrent/synchronization/mri_lockable_object.rb:43:in `ns_wait'
   /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/2.4.0/gems/concurrent-ruby-1.0.5/lib/concurrent/synchronization/abstract_lockable_object.rb:43:in `ns_wait_until'
   /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/2.4.0/gems/concurrent-ruby-1.0.5/lib/concurrent/atomic/event.rb:87:in `block in wait'
   /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/2.4.0/gems/concurrent-ruby-1.0.5/lib/concurrent/synchronization/mri_lockable_object.rb:38:in `block in synchronize'
   /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/2.4.0/gems/concurrent-ruby-1.0.5/lib/concurrent/synchronization/mri_lockable_object.rb:38:in `synchronize'
   /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/2.4.0/gems/concurrent-ruby-1.0.5/lib/concurrent/synchronization/mri_lockable_object.rb:38:in `synchronize'
   /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/2.4.0/gems/concurrent-ruby-1.0.5/lib/concurrent/atomic/event.rb:84:in `wait'
   /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/2.4.0/gems/concurrent-ruby-1.0.5/lib/concurrent/executor/ruby_executor_service.rb:49:in `wait_for_termination'
   concurrent_test.rb:16:in `<main>'

I have currently no idea what this is about. But this second problem does not happen in our application and is not a dealbreaker.

Thanks a bunch for having a look at the first question though - this would help us a lot. Keep up your wonderful work!


  • Operating system: mac
  • concurrent-ruby version: 1.0.5
  • concurrent-ruby-ext installed: no
  • concurrent-ruby-edge used: no
Lingua principale
Ruby
Stelle
5.8k
Fork
420
Merge medio
20h 45m
PR unite (30g)
4

Guida per i contributori

Apri la guida per i contributori

Come iniziare

  1. Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
  2. Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
  3. Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
  4. Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.

Altre issue di ruby-concurrency/concurrent-ruby

Tutte le issue di ruby-concurrency/concurrent-ruby

Issue simili

Altre issue su Ruby

Ricevi le nuove issue nella tua casella

Un breve riepilogo di issue GitHub adatte ai principianti.