noisy `-32801` ("Content Modified") errors

Aperta
#3,420 4 commenti 6 reazioni 0 assegnatari Vedi su GitHub

Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.

Valutazione

Difficoltà
4/5
Tempo stimato
3-5 giorni
Idoneità per principianti
48/100
Tipo di issue
Bug
Chiarezza
Abbastanza chiara
Stato di attività
Tranquilla
Stack tecnologico
lua, neovim
Ambito
devtools

Direzione di ricerca

Inizia tracciando il percorso della richiesta textDocument/semanticTokens/full e il modo in cui le notifiche textDocument/didChange influenzano le richieste in corso. Confronta questo comportamento con la specifica LSP responseError.code; il lavoro è completato quando le normali modifiche ai documenti accodate non producono più -32801, mentre le modifiche effettivamente esterne possono ancora produrlo.

Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.

Descrizione

bug
How are you using the lua-language-server?

NeoVim

Which OS are you using?

MacOS

What is the issue affecting?

Other

Expected Behaviour

In the request-completion path, when the server has computed a result against document version V, return that result regardless of whether didChange for V+1 (or later) has since arrived. Only return -32801 if the document
modification was genuinely external / out-of-band — which is rare in normal usage and not what didChange represents.

If pre-empting in-flight requests on didChange is desired as an optimization, the spec-compliant signal is for the client to send $/cancelRequest. The server should not unilaterally short-circuit valid in-flight work with -32801.

Per the spec, the client is supposed to handle staleness via cancellation. With lua-language-server pre-empting that decision and erroring instead:

  • Clients that handle -32801 strictly as an error end up logging spurious errors (cf. neovim/neovim#40208).
  • Clients that could have used the older-version result (perfectly valid per the spec — "even computed on an older state might still be useful") never get the chance.
  • Clients that wanted to cancel can no longer rely on $/cancelRequest semantics because the server has already aborted on its own initiative.
Actual Behaviour

Sending a fast sequence of didChanges while semantic-tokens requests are in flight causes the server to error every in-flight request with:

{ "code": -32801, "message": "Content modified." }

even though the modification was delivered through normal didChange notifications, not "outside normal conditions."

Reproduction steps
  1. Open a Lua file in any LSP-capable editor that requests semanticTokens/full (e.g. Neovim 0.12+).
  2. Start typing across multiple lines, fast enough that successive didChange notifications outpace the server's processing.
  3. Observe: every in-flight semantic-tokens request comes back with -32801 Content modified. instead of a (possibly stale) result.
Additional Notes

lua-language-server returns LSP error -32801 ("Content Modified") in response to textDocument/semanticTokens/full (and likely other requests) whenever a textDocument/didChange notification arrives before the response is sent.
This contradicts the LSP specification, which explicitly forbids using -32801 for content changes detected in unprocessed messages — i.e. for the exact case currently being signaled.

What the spec says:

LSP §responseError.code (specifically the ContentModified = -32801 entry):

The server detected that the content of a document got modified outside normal conditions. A server should NOT send this error code if it detects a content change in its unprocessed messages. The result even computed on an older
state might still be useful for the client.

If a client decides that a result is not of any use anymore the client should cancel the request.

So the intended semantics are:

  • -32801 is for "out-of-band" content modification (e.g., the file on disk changed in a way the server can't reconcile with its in-flight state).
Log File

No response

Lingua principale
Lua
Stelle
4.4k
Fork
442
Metriche di merge delle PR
Nessuna PR unita negli ultimi 30g

Guida per i contributori

Apri la guida per i contributori

Come iniziare

  1. Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
  2. Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
  3. Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
  4. Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.

Altre issue di LuaLS/lua-language-server

Tutte le issue di LuaLS/lua-language-server

Issue simili

Altre issue su Lua

Ricevi le nuove issue nella tua casella

Un breve riepilogo di issue GitHub adatte ai principianti.