traitlets.Set should support generic type annotations for type safety
- Langage dominant
- Python
- Étoiles
- 653
- Forks
- 217
- Merge moyen
- 2 j 21 h
- PR mergées (30 j)
- 2
Description
## Problem
`traitlets.Set` currently lacks generic type support, making it impossible to specify the type of elements it contains for proper type checking.
## Current Situation
```python
from traitlets import Set
import traitlets
class MyClass(traitlets.HasTraits):
# This works but provides no type information
my_set = Set()
# This doesn't work - no generic support
# my_set: Set[str] = Set() # Type error
```
## Desired Behavior
`traitlets.Set` should support generic type annotations similar to how Python's built-in collections work:
```python
from traitlets import Set
import traitlets
class MyClass(traitlets.HasTraits):
# Should be possible for type safety
room_ids: Set[str] = Set()
numbers: Set[int] = Set(default_value={1, 2, 3})
```
## Reference
The `Set` class is implemented in [`traitlets/traitlets.py`](https://github.com/ipython/traitlets/blob/main/traitlets/traitlets.py) as a container trait.
Guide de contribution
Ouvrir le guide de contribution
Piste de recherche
Start in traitlets/traitlets.py at the Set container trait implementation and inspect how its type parameters could correspond to the annotated element type. Done means Set accepts annotations such as Set[str] and Set[int] while preserving the existing default-value behavior; the issue does not name a test file or test entry point.
Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.
Évaluation
- Stack technique
- python
- Domaine
- tooling
- Type d'issue
- Fonctionnalité
- Difficulté
- 3/5
- Temps estimé
- 1-2 jours
- Activité
- À l'abandon
- Clarté
- Plutôt claire
- Accessibilité débutants
- 45/100