Transition from `CompositeError` to builtin `ExceptionGroup`
- 主要語言
- Jupyter Notebook
- 星號
- 2.6k
- 分支
- 1k
- PR 合併指標
- 30 天內沒有已合併 PR
描述
[PEP-654](https://peps.python.org/pep-0654/) adds a new builtin `ExceptionGroup` type to Python, and `except*` syntax for cleanly handling multiple errors. [The backport](https://pypi.org/project/exceptiongroup/) is already widely used, including by Pytest, Trio, Hypothesis, and many others. I'd love to see `ipyparallel` join in, so that all our users get interoperable tooling and - once they're on recent versions of Python - nice syntax too.
Logistically, this is a substantial lift, but following e.g. https://github.com/python-trio/trio/pull/2213 will hopefully be a lot easier than doing the whole thing from scratch. You might even choose to wait a while for the ecosystem to mature, but I thought it was worth opening an issue now - if nothing else, it's relevant to any _other_ proposed changes to `CompositeError` - and I'm confident that switching over will be the best way forward within the next few years.
貢獻指南
研究方向
首先檢視 ipyparallel 的 CompositeError 實作,以及 issue 中描述的相關 Python Trio 遷移,同時查看 PEP 654 和 exceptiongroup backport。完成的標準是 ipyparallel 使用可互通的內建 ExceptionGroup 行為,同時保留其現有的多錯誤處理方式。
由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。
評估
- 技術堆疊
- python
- 領域
- distributed-systems
- Issue 類型
- 重構
- 難度
- 5/5
- 預估耗時
- 一週以上
- 活躍度
- 停滯
- 描述清晰度
- 基本清楚
- 新手友好度
- 30/100