Determine final NameResolver to LoadBalancer communication
Aperta
- Lingua principale
- Java
- Stelle
- 12.1k
- Fork
- 4k
- Merge medio
- 2g 17h
- PR unite (30g)
- 37
Descrizione
Alluded to in https://github.com/grpc/grpc-java/pull/4137#discussion_r171640085 . The biggest issue is probably how Java allows a list of lists of addresses. This is different than the other implementations. We need to come to a cross-language agreement about whether list of lists is necessary.
But we also need to design the final solution for how proxy information should be plumbed from the NameResolver through the LoadBalancer into Subchannel. That will remove `PairSocketAddress` or stabilize it (with a better name!).
CC @zhangkun83
Guida per i contributori
Apri la guida per i contributori
Valutazione
Questa issue non è ancora stata valutata.