pick_first (legacy): channel permanently stuck in READY with a stale picker after resolver refresh burst during transient network failure; wait-for-ready RPCs black-hole until deadline
Nadie ha tomado este issue todavía.
- Lenguaje dominante
- Java
- Estrellas
- 12.1k
- Forks
- 4k
- Merge medio
- 2 d 17 h
- PR fusionados (30 d)
- 37
Descripción
grpc-java-pickfirst-wedge.tar.gz
What version of gRPC-Java are you using?
1.76.2 (grpc-netty, netty 4.1.136.Final)
What is your environment?
Linux, Java 17 (also observed under Java 11 in production).
Load balancing policy: pick_first (single-address target).
Active LB implementation: legacy io.grpc.internal.PickFirstLoadBalancer (its
RequestConnectionPicker appears in the channel logs; the new
PickFirstLeafLoadBalancer was not enabled — see "Additional data point" below).
What did you expect to see?
After a transient network failure heals, a pick_first channel either recovers or
transitions out of READY so that the LB policy or the application (via
notifyWhenStateChanged) can react.
What did you see instead?
The channel is left permanently reporting READY while every RPC — including
withWaitForReady() RPCs — buffers forever and fails only by its own deadline:
DEADLINE_EXCEEDED: ... Name resolution delay 0 ... [buffered_nanos=..., waiting_for_connection]
No channel state transition ever fires again, so nothing can observe that the channel
is broken. ManagedChannel.enterIdle() reliably recovers it.
Mechanism, from FINEST ChannelLogger logs (attached):
- The transport to the current address dies (TLS handshakes reset — in production,
a rolling container upgrade left the port published while the backend reset
handshakes for ~10 seconds). - gRPC's reconnect logic calls
NameResolver.refresh()repeatedly. The resolver
answers asynchronously with a mix ofonErrorandonResultdeliveries (it is
backed by a discovery service that sits behind the same failing network, so
deliveries arrive out of order relative to subchannel state changes). - Each
onResultcausesPickFirstLoadBalancerto create a replacement subchannel
and schedule delayed shutdown (~5s) of the previous one. - Within the delayed-shutdown window, the old subchannel completes its connection
against the recovering backend and reaches READY; the LB publishes a READY picker
referencing it. - The delayed shutdown then fires (
SHUTDOWN with UNAVAILABLE(Subchannel shutdown invoked)), terminating the transport — but the published READY picker is never
replaced. The channel stays READY forever with a picker whose subchannel has no
transport.
Steps to reproduce the bug
Self-contained repro attached: one Java file (BurstRepro.java, only grpc-java +
netty dependencies, in-process backend server), a small Python TCP proxy that models
the network failure (reset mode: accept + immediately close, emulating TLS resets),
and a driver script. Typically reproduces within a few iterations.
Per iteration: verify a healthy RPC through the proxy, switch the proxy to reset
for a few seconds (driving reconnect/backoff and resolver refreshes), heal the proxy,
then probe with a withWaitForReady() RPC with a deadline.
Two wedge variants observed:
logs/run2-READY-signature/— channel READY, wait-for-ready probe black-holes to
DEADLINE_EXCEEDED;enterIdle()immediately recovers it. This matches our
production incident signature.logs/run1-connecting-wedge/— channel wedged in CONNECTING with no reconnect
attempt scheduled.
Additional data point: the new PickFirstLeafLoadBalancer does not wedge
Running the identical repro with GRPC_EXPERIMENTAL_ENABLE_NEW_PICK_FIRST=true
(confirmed active: PickFirstLeafLoadBalancer in the logs), the permanent black-hole
does not reproduce in 40 iterations. The same post-burst sequence still leaves the
channel claiming READY while the picked transport is dead, but the RPC fails fast
with UNAVAILABLE and gRPC immediately schedules a resolver refresh, after which the
channel recovers (logs/run3-newpf-no-wedge/).
So the catastrophic silent wedge appears specific to the legacy
PickFirstLoadBalancer. Since the new PF also has a known stuck-in-IDLE issue
(#12395) with a draft fix that appears stalled (#12403), may we suggest revisiting
that PR — fixing #12395 and graduating the new PF would retire both wedge variants,
whereas today users are stuck choosing between a legacy PF with this READY wedge and
an experimental PF with a known IDLE wedge.
Related issues
- #12395 —
PickFirstLeafLoadBalancerstuck in IDLE on backend address change (Java
analog of grpc/grpc-go#8615). Same family: LB internal state diverging from the
published picker when a resolver update races a subchannel state change. Differs
in that it wedges in IDLE and affects the new leaf PF; this report is the legacy
PF wedging in READY, which is strictly worse (wait-for-ready RPCs black-hole and
no observable state ever changes). - #11082 — PF not emitting TRANSIENT_FAILURE (missed state propagation).
- #11227 — NPE from inconsistent PF internal state after resolution errors (fixed in
1.66); shows the resolver-error path mutating LB state non-atomically.
Production impact
Our etcd-backed auth-service channel black-holed all RPCs for 60+ seconds (until
process restart) during a rolling upgrade. The server saw zero incoming RPCs during
the window while the client channel claimed READY throughout. We now run an
application-level watchdog that calls enterIdle() when RPCs time out while the
channel claims READY.
Attachment
grpc-java-pickfirst-wedge.tar.gz — repro sources, driver, and FINEST channel logs
for all three runs described above.
Guía de contribución
Primeros pasos
- Lee el issue completo y luego la guía de contribución del proyecto.
- Comenta en el issue que vas a ocuparte — evita que dos personas hagan lo mismo.
- Haz un fork del repositorio y trabaja en una rama.
- Abre un pull request que haga referencia al número del issue.
Línea de trabajo
Empieza con io.grpc.internal.PickFirstLoadBalancer y ejecuta el BurstRepro.java adjunto, el script controlador y el proxy para reproducir los bloqueos READY y CONNECTING. Compara el comportamiento heredado con los logs de PickFirstLeafLoadBalancer en logs/run2-READY-signature/ y logs/run3-newpf-no-wedge/. Se considera terminado cuando la política heredada ya no deja un canal READY con un picker inactivo y la sonda wait-for-ready se recupera o falla de forma visible.
Escrito por el modelo de indexación a partir del texto del issue.
Evaluación
- Stack tecnológico
- java
- Área
- backend-api-design, networking
- Tipo de issue
- Error
- Dificultad
- 4/5
- Tiempo estimado
- 3-5 días
- Estado de actividad
- Tranquilo
- Claridad
- Bastante claro
- Aptitud para principiantes
- 45/100