graphql-python / graphql-python/graphene

In 3.1.0, `resolve_type` method on Interfaces and Unions no longer supports returning the GraphQL Type as a string

Ouverte
#1,555 1 commentaire 0 réactions 0 personnes assignées Voir sur GitHub
🐛 bug
Langage dominant
Python
Étoiles
8.2k
Forks
818
Métriques de merge des PR
Aucune PR mergée en 30 j

Description

* **What is the current behavior?**
As of 3.1.0, the `resolve_type` method on Interfaces and Unions no longer supports returning the GraphQL Type as a string as opposed to the actual Graphene Type. I think this might be an unintended regression from https://github.com/graphql-python/graphene/pull/1421.

* **What is the expected behavior?**
Our project heavily depends on resolve_type returning a string for the GraphQL Type as opposed to the Graphene Type that implements it.

* **What is the motivation / use case for changing the behavior?**
While it's possible to refactor most of our code to return the Graphene Type, there are some cases where it's very difficult to break circular imports. The reason for that is that some of our implementations of the `resolve_type` method delegates to returning a property of an Enum and the Enum definition can't reference the Graphene Type because the Graphene Type references the enum.

* **Please tell us about your environment:**

- Version: Trying to upgrade to 3.1.0.
- Platform: Python 3.12.2 on Linux

* **Other information** (e.g. detailed explanation, stacktraces, related issues, suggestions how to fix, links for us to have context, eg. stackoverflow)
I created https://github.com/perlow/graphene/pull/1 in a fork. I don't have write permission the repo to request a merge. If this looks reasonable, I can add a unit test for the behavior.

Guide de contribution

Aucun guide de contribution indexé pour ce dépôt

Évaluation

Cette issue n'a pas encore été évaluée.

Recevez les nouvelles issues par e-mail

Un résumé court des issues GitHub adaptées aux débutants.