grafana / grafana/pyroscope-python
py-spy's short_filenames cache is never evicted (unbounded growth for apps that compile code with fresh filenames)
- 主要语言
- Rust
- 星标
- 4
- 派生
- 2
- 平均合并
- 2 天 4 小时
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 5
描述
> 🤖 **This issue was written by an AI agent** (Claude Code), while investigating
> #37. The code references and measurements below were verified against the
> actual sources and a running container, but a human has not reviewed the
> writeup.
## What
`PythonSpy::shorten_filename` memoizes every filename it has ever seen and
never evicts (`py-spy/src/python_spy.rs`):
```rust
pub short_filenames: HashMap>, // :37, initialized empty at :96
fn shorten_filename(&mut self, filename: &str) -> Option {
if self.config.full_filenames {
return Some(filename.to_string());
}
if let Some(short) = self.short_filenames.get(filename) { // :561
return short.clone();
}
...
self.short_filenames.insert(filename.to_owned(), shortened.clone()); // :596
shortened
}
```
There is no cap and no eviction. By contrast the sibling caches in the same
struct *are* invalidated when a thread exits:
```rust
self.python_thread_ids.clear();
self.python_thread_names.clear(); // :276-277 — but not short_filenames
```
This path is active for pyroscope: `full_filenames` defaults to `false`
(`py-spy/src/config.rs:134`) and the extension builds its config with
`..py_spy::Config::default()`.
## Impact, measured honestly
Growth is bounded by the number of **distinct filenames that appear in sampled
frames**, not by how many code objects the app creates. For a normal app that
is the size of the codebase — a few thousand entries, and effectively bounded.
It becomes unbounded for apps that compile code with fresh filenames *and*
spend CPU inside it: templating engines, notebooks, ORM/dataclass-style
codegen, `eval`/`exec`-heavy code.
A/B in a container (Python 3.11, `pyroscope-io==1.2.1`, `sample_rate=997`,
identical interpreter-side work in both runs, only the filename differs):
```
UNIQUE=1 90s modules= 71616 rss=69 MiB (+50) # fresh filename per module
UNIQUE=0 90s modules= 75132 rss=57 MiB (+38) # one reused filename
```
~12 MiB of the growth is attributable to the ~71k distinct filenames the
sampler observed, i.e. **~175 bytes per distinct filename**, and it is
monotonic. (Most of the shared +38 MiB is interpreter churn and buffered
profile data, not this cache.)
A first attempt at this A/B showed *no* difference (+6 vs +5 MiB) even with 5M
unique filenames, because the generated functions were too short-lived to be
sampled — worth knowing if anyone re-measures.
Secondary cost on the same code path: every cache *miss* does filesystem work
on the sampler thread — `Path::exists()` for `__init__.py` while walking
parents, plus an extra `stat` of `/proc//root` when the process
is detected as dockerized. So a high rate of unique filenames also means a
`stat` storm at sampling frequency.
## Suggested fix
Bound it: an LRU (or a plain cap with a clear-on-overflow, matching how
`python_thread_*` are already handled), or drop the memoization and pay the
`strip_prefix` cost per sample — it is cheap next to the syscalls it currently
guards.
Upstream: this code lives in `benfred/py-spy`, so a fix there plus a pin bump
here.
## Context
Found while investigating #37 (root cause and reproducer in
grafana/pyroscope-python#146). Unrelated to that crash.
贡献指南
这个仓库没有索引到贡献指南
调研方向
从 py-spy/src/python_spy.rs 开始,该文件中定义、读取并填充了 short_filenames,并将其生命周期与 python_thread_ids 和 python_thread_names 缓存进行比较。检查 py-spy/src/config.rs 中 full_filenames 的默认值,然后协调 py-spy 的上游更改并在此处更新依赖固定版本;当 filename-cache 的增长受到限制或被移除时,即表示完成。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
评估
- 技术栈
- rust
- 领域
- performance
- Issue 类型
- 缺陷
- 难度
- 4/5
- 预计耗时
- 3-5 天
- 活跃度
- 活跃
- 描述清晰度
- 基本清楚
- 新手友好度
- 45/100