googleapis / googleapis/google-cloud-python

Faster INSERT methods

Offen
#15,795 14 Kommentare 4 Reaktionen 1 zugewiesene Person Beansprucht von @tswast Auf GitHub ansehen
api: bigquery priority: p3 type: feature request
Vorherrschende Sprache
Python
Sterne
5.4k
Forks
1.8k
Ø Merge
3 T. 4 Std.
Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
122

Beschreibung

**Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.**
I need to work with large amounts of rows on an ETL service and wanted to use SQLAlchemy ORM backed by BigQuery dialect to write more pythonic code, but it is extremely slow to upload more than tens of rows.

**Describe the solution you'd like**
Be able to use ORM-Enabled INSERT like the SQLAlchemy docs suggest, or at least the soon-to-be legacy `Session.bulk_insert_mappings` and have better performance

**Describe alternatives you've considered**
I've tried using all methods provided by this [SQLA FAQ](https://docs.sqlalchemy.org/en/14/faq/performance.html#i-m-inserting-400-000-rows-with-the-orm-and-it-s-really-slow) and none could be faster than about 900 seconds for a minimum of 200 rows.

**Aditional context**
While the examples shows that methods like the bulk_insert_mappings could do 0.4 seconds for hundreds of thousands of rows, using BigQuery dialect I've faced 2 h 30min to upload about 4k rows. I don't expect that BQ could reach anything close to the 0.4 seconds for 100k rows, but something around 5, 6 minutes I do believe is possible, since it is the average time the BigQuery client from `google.cloud.bigquery` can do for an upload of about 90k rows.

Beitragsleitfaden

Beitragsleitfaden öffnen

Bewertung

Dieses Issue wurde noch nicht bewertet.

Neue Issues direkt in Ihr Postfach

Eine kurze Übersicht über anfängerfreundliche GitHub-Issues.