googleapis / googleapis/google-api-java-client

Drive: Batch request timeout docu improvement

Abierto
#2,597 0 comentarios 0 reacciones 0 asignados Ver en GitHub
api: drive priority: p3 type: docs
Lenguaje dominante
Java
Estrellas
1.5k
Forks
772
Merge medio
1 h 44 min
PR fusionados (30 d)
1

Descripción

#### Environment details

1. Specify the API at the beginning of the title. For example, "BigQuery: ...").
General, Core, and Other are also allowed as types
2. OS type and version: Linux tux 6.12.39-1-MANJARO
3. Java version: openjdk 21.0.8 2025-07-15
4. version(s): google-api-services-drive v3-rev20250723-2.0.0

#### Steps to reproduce

1. create batch request with ~20 Drive Permission creating request
2. sometimes get `java.net.SocketTimeoutException : Read timed out`

#### Code example

```java
BatchRequest batch = service.batch();

// write instead ↓
BatchRequest batch = service.batch(new HttpRequestInitializer() {

@Override
public void initialize(HttpRequest request) throws IOException {
requestInitializer.initialize(request);
request.setConnectTimeout(3 * 60_000);
request.setReadTimeout(3 * 60_000);
}
});
```

#### Stack trace
```
java.net.SocketTimeoutException: Read timed out
at java.base/sun.nio.ch.NioSocketImpl.timedRead(NioSocketImpl.java:278)
at java.base/sun.nio.ch.NioSocketImpl.implRead(NioSocketImpl.java:304)
at java.base/sun.nio.ch.NioSocketImpl.read(NioSocketImpl.java:346)
at java.base/sun.nio.ch.NioSocketImpl$1.read(NioSocketImpl.java:796)
at java.base/java.net.Socket$SocketInputStream.read(Socket.java:1099)
at java.base/sun.security.ssl.SSLSocketInputRecord.read(SSLSocketInputRecord.java:489)
at java.base/sun.security.ssl.SSLSocketInputRecord.readHeader(SSLSocketInputRecord.java:483)
at java.base/sun.security.ssl.SSLSocketInputRecord.bytesInCompletePacket(SSLSocketInputRecord.java:70)
at java.base/sun.security.ssl.SSLSocketImpl.readApplicationRecord(SSLSocketImpl.java:1461)
at java.base/sun.security.ssl.SSLSocketImpl$AppInputStream.read(SSLSocketImpl.java:1066)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.fill(BufferedInputStream.java:291)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read1(BufferedInputStream.java:347)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.implRead(BufferedInputStream.java:420)
at java.base/java.io.BufferedInputStream.read(BufferedInputStream.java:399)
at java.base/sun.net.www.http.HttpClient.parseHTTPHeader(HttpClient.java:827)
at java.base/sun.net.www.http.HttpClient.parseHTTP(HttpClient.java:759)
at java.base/sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection.getInputStream0(HttpURLConnection.java:1706)
at java.base/sun.net.www.protocol.http.HttpURLConnection.getInputStream(HttpURLConnection.java:1615)
at java.base/java.net.HttpURLConnection.getResponseCode(HttpURLConnection.java:531)
at java.base/sun.net.www.protocol.https.HttpsURLConnectionImpl.getResponseCode(HttpsURLConnectionImpl.java:307)
at com.google.api.client.http.javanet.NetHttpResponse.(NetHttpResponse.java:36)
at com.google.api.client.http.javanet.NetHttpRequest.execute(NetHttpRequest.java:152)
at com.google.api.client.http.javanet.NetHttpRequest.execute(NetHttpRequest.java:84)
at com.google.api.client.http.HttpRequest.execute(HttpRequest.java:1012)
at com.google.api.client.googleapis.batch.BatchRequest.execute(BatchRequest.java:257)
```

#### External references such as API reference guides

- https://developers.google.com/api-client-library/java/google-api-java-client/errors
- https://stackoverflow.com/questions/31312692/change-read-timeout-for-a-batch-http-request-on-using-google-api-client-library?rq=4

similar problem

- https://stackoverflow.com/questions/70358867/gcp-java-sdk-throwing-socket-connection-timeout-after-20seconds?noredirect=1&lq=1

#### Any additional information below

When searching for the error you find following docu https://developers.google.com/api-client-library/java/google-api-java-client/errors . Sadly it does not mention that you need to set the `HttpRequestInitializer` timeout for batch requests separately.
The default timeout seems very low (20s), so increasing it for batch requests is almost a must.

It would save a lot of time if either the default would be higher, but it would suffice if one could find the solution when searching for the error/exception.
As you can see, the stackoverflow post is from 2015, so nothing new.

Guía de contribución

Abrir la guía de contribución

Evaluación

Este issue todavía no se ha evaluado.

Recibe los nuevos issues en tu correo

Un resumen breve de issues de GitHub para principiantes.