[Extension]: Update Status Report to v1.4.2

### Extension ID

status-report

### Extension Name

Status Report

### Version

1.4.2

### Description

Project status, feature progress, and next-action recommendations for spec-driven workflows.

### Author

Open-Agent-Tools

### Repository URL

https://github.com/Open-Agent-Tools/spec-kit-status

### Download URL

https://github.com/Open-Agent-Tools/spec-kit-status/archive/refs/tags/v1.4.2.zip

### License

MIT

### Homepage (optional)

https://github.com/Open-Agent-Tools/spec-kit-status

### Documentation URL (optional)

https://github.com/Open-Agent-Tools/spec-kit-status/blob/main/README.md

### Changelog URL (optional)

https://github.com/Open-Agent-Tools/spec-kit-status/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md

### Required Spec Kit Version

>=1.0.0

### Required Tools (optional)

- none — Bash, PowerShell and Python runtimes all ship with the extension, and Spec Kit selects the variant the project was initialized with. Git is optional.

### Number of Commands

1

### Number of Hooks (optional)

0

### Tags

workflow, project-management, status

### Key Features

- Pipeline view of every feature with its workflow stage (Specify, Plan, Tasks, Implement)
- Artifact status for the current feature: spec, plan, tasks, research, data model, quickstart, contracts, checklists
- Task completion counts and percentages, computed by the script rather than inferred by the agent
- Checklist progress tracking
- Recommends the exact next command to run, written as `__SPECKIT_COMMAND_*__` tokens so it renders in each agent's own invocation style
- `--json` output for tooling
- Bash, PowerShell and Python runtimes, with cross-runtime parity asserted by the repo's test suite

### Testing Checklist

- [x] Extension installs successfully via download URL
- [x] All commands execute without errors
- [x] Documentation is complete and accurate
- [x] No security vulnerabilities identified
- [x] Tested on at least one real project

### Submission Requirements

- [x] Valid `extension.yml` manifest included
- [x] README.md with installation and usage instructions
- [x] LICENSE file included
- [x] GitHub release created with version tag
- [x] All command files exist and are properly formatted
- [x] Extension ID follows naming conventions (lowercase-with-hyphens)

### Testing Details

**Tested on:** macOS 15 (arm64) with Spec Kit 1.0.5, PowerShell 7.6.6, Python 3.13

**Test project:** a throwaway project created with `specify init --here --integration claude`, plus the repo's own fixture harness at `tests/test-status.sh`

**Test scenarios:**

1. Installed from the v1.4.2 release archive with `specify extension add status-report --from `. Installs cleanly and registers the skill at `.claude/skills/speckit-status-report-show/SKILL.md`.
2. Inspected the rendered skill. `{SCRIPT}` resolves to the installed extension path, and `__SPECKIT_COMMAND_*__` tokens render in the active agent's style (`/speckit-plan` for a skills-based Claude install).
3. Ran the discovery script from the installed location against a project with features, tasks and checklists, and confirmed the JSON matches what the command spec expects.
4. Ran `tests/test-status.sh`, which executes the full assertion suite against each installed runtime and then asserts they agree. 26 assertions per runtime, plus cross-runtime parity on both the JSON output and the rendered status file.

**Coverage of Spec Kit 1.0.x behaviour:**

- Current-feature resolution follows Spec Kit's own precedence from `scripts/bash/common.sh`: `SPECIFY_FEATURE_DIRECTORY`, then `.specify/feature.json`, then `SPECIFY_FEATURE`, then the git branch. Each path has a test.
- Feature discovery covers every prefix shape Spec Kit emits, including `--timestamp` directories and sequential prefixes longer than three digits.
- Three defects were found and fixed during this verification pass, each with a regression test: a branch misread in a repository with no commits (1.4.1), a forwarded agent-level flag aborting the script, and a wildcard accepted as a feature name on PowerShell (1.4.2).

**On the security checkbox:** no formal security audit or scanner was run. The basis for checking that box is that the extension is read-mostly Bash, PowerShell and Python that performs no network calls, handles no credentials, and writes exactly one file inside the project (`specs/spec-status.md`). Happy to provide more if maintainers want a stronger standard here.

### Example Usage

```bash
# Install
specify extension add status-report --from https://github.com/Open-Agent-Tools/spec-kit-status/archive/refs/tags/v1.4.2.zip

# Show the overview plus detail for the current feature
/speckit.status-report.show

# Overview only, or with task and checklist breakdowns
/speckit.status-report.show --all
/speckit.status-report.show --verbose

# Target a specific feature, by name or number
/speckit.status-report.show 002-dashboard
/speckit.status-report.show --feature 002-dashboard --json
```

Output:

```
Spec-Driven Development Status

Project: my-app
Branch: 002-dashboard
Constitution: ✓ Defined (v1.0.0)

Features
+-----------------+---------+------+-------+------------------+
| Feature | Specify | Plan | Tasks | Implement |
+-----------------+---------+------+-------+------------------+
| 001-onboarding | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ Complete |
| 002-dashboard < | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ● 12/18 (67%) |
+-----------------+---------+------+-------+------------------+

Legend: ✓ complete ● in progress ○ ready - not started

002-dashboard

Artifacts:
✓ spec.md ✓ plan.md ✓ tasks.md
✓ research.md - data-model.md - quickstart.md
- contracts/ - checklists/

Next: /speckit.implement
Continue implementation (12/18 tasks complete)
```

### Proposed Catalog Entry

```json
{
"status-report": {
"name": "Status Report",
"id": "status-report",
"description": "Project status, feature progress, and next-action recommendations for spec-driven workflows.",
"author": "Open-Agent-Tools",
"version": "1.4.2",
"download_url": "https://github.com/Open-Agent-Tools/spec-kit-status/archive/refs/tags/v1.4.2.zip",
"repository": "https://github.com/Open-Agent-Tools/spec-kit-status",
"homepage": "https://github.com/Open-Agent-Tools/spec-kit-status",
"documentation": "https://github.com/Open-Agent-Tools/spec-kit-status/blob/main/README.md",
"changelog": "https://github.com/Open-Agent-Tools/spec-kit-status/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md",
"license": "MIT",
"category": "visibility",
"effect": "read-write",
"requires": {
"speckit_version": ">=1.0.0"
},
"provides": {
"commands": 1,
"hooks": 0
},
"tags": [
"workflow",
"project-management",
"status"
],
"verified": false,
"downloads": 0,
"stars": 0,
"created_at": "2026-03-16T00:00:00Z",
"updated_at": "2026-09-11T00:00:00Z"
}
}
```

### Additional Context

This is an **update** to an entry already in `extensions/catalog.community.json`, not a new
addition. `created_at`, `downloads` and `stars` above are carried over unchanged from the
existing entry.

Three fields change beyond the version bump, and two of them are corrections rather than
consequences of the release:

1. **`effect`: `read-only` → `read-write`.** The existing entry has always been wrong about
this. The command writes a `specs/spec-status.md` snapshot on every run, so it has never
been read-only. This also affects the row in `docs/community/extensions.md`, where Status
Report is currently listed as `Read-only` and should read `Read+Write`.
2. **`requires.speckit_version`: `>=0.1.0` → `>=1.0.0`.** The old floor was carried over from
the extension's first release. The extension now resolves the current feature through
`.specify/feature.json`, and 1.0.5 is the only version it is verified against, so the
narrower floor reflects what is actually tested.
3. **`version` and `download_url`** move to 1.4.2.

One note for whoever reviews the generated PR: `category` and `effect` are present on the live
catalog entries but are absent from the entry structure in the
`add-community-extension` workflow's own template. Please make sure the `effect` correction
survives into the merged entry, since it is the main point of this submission.

There is also a separate, unrelated extension in the catalog under the id `status` ("Project
Status" by KhawarHabibKhan). This submission does not touch it.

Start by comparing the existing status-report entry in extensions/catalog.community.json with the proposed v1.4.2 values, then inspect docs/community/extensions.md for the matching effect label. Verify that the catalog entry preserves the carried-over metadata and corrected requirements, and check the add-community-extension workflow/template for any validation before submitting the update.

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。