gh stack sync pushed a stack branch's merge commit directly onto the trunk branch (`main`)

## Summary

Running `gh stack sync` on an existing 4-branch stack resulted in `origin/main` being advanced to a commit that merges a stack branch's feature commit directly into trunk — outside of any PR merge. The affected PR was never marked merged by GitHub (`mergedAt: null`), yet its code was live on `main`. `sync`'s own output reported full success at every step and gave no indication that a trunk branch had been mutated.

## Environment

- `gh-stack` v0.1.0
- `gh` 2.96.0
- git 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)
- macOS 15.7.4, arm64

## Stack layout at the time

```
main (trunk)
└─ feature-layer-1 (PR #101, base: main)
└─ feature-layer-2 (PR #102, base: feature-layer-1)
└─ feature-layer-3 (PR #103, base: feature-layer-2)
└─ feature-layer-4 (PR #104, base: feature-layer-3)
```

The stack had already been created with `gh stack init` + `gh stack submit --auto`. Between submit and this incident, `main` had advanced (unrelated PRs merged), and one of the stack branches had also been manually rebased with plain git (outside `gh stack`) to resolve an unrelated conflict. Also the first stacked pr was approved.

## Reproduction

1. With the stack above checked out locally (on the topmost branch), run:
```sh
gh stack sync
```
2. Observed output (abbreviated, all steps reported success):
```
✓ Fetched latest main from origin
✓ Trunk main fast-forwarded to
✓ Fast-forwarded feature-layer-2 to

Rebasing stack ...
✓ Rebased feature-layer-1 onto main
✓ Rebased feature-layer-2 onto feature-layer-1
✓ Rebased feature-layer-3 onto feature-layer-2
✓ Rebased feature-layer-4 onto feature-layer-3

Pushing 4 branches to origin...
✓ Pushed 4 branches

Syncing PRs ...
✓ PR #101 (feature-layer-1) — Open
✓ PR #102 (feature-layer-2) — Open
✓ PR #103 (feature-layer-3) — Open
✓ PR #104 (feature-layer-4) — Open
✓ Stack on GitHub is up to date with 4 PRs (stack #501)

✓ Stack synced
Stacked on main ()
```
3. After this ran, `origin/main`'s tip (verified via `git ls-remote origin refs/heads/main` and the GitHub API `GET /repos/{owner}/{repo}/branches/main`) was a commit that did **not** exist before this command ran.

## Evidence that this was a `sync`-internal push, not a manual one

- `git reflog show main` (local trunk branch) shows only local fast-forwards (`branch: Reset to ...`) — it was **never** locally at the commit that ended up on `origin/main`.
- `git reflog show feature-layer-1` (the bottom-of-stack branch, whose base is trunk) shows:
```
feature-layer-1@{0}: commit (merge): Merge branch 'main' of https://github.com/.../ into feature-layer-1
feature-layer-1@{1}: commit: feat:
feature-layer-1@{2}: branch: Created from origin/main
```
Note the entry type: `commit (merge)`, **not** a rebase. This is despite the CLI's own printed log for this exact step reading `"✓ Rebased feature-layer-1 onto main"`.
- `sha-A` above is byte-identical to `origin/main`'s new tip after `sync` ran (confirmed via `git diff sha-A ` = empty, and matching author/committer/date/message via the GitHub commits API).
- `origin/feature-layer-1` (the actual remote branch for that PR) was, after `sync`, at a **different** SHA than `sha-A` — a proper rebase result, distinct commit. So the merge commit did not simply get pushed to "the wrong copy of the same intended branch"; it ended up on `refs/heads/main` specifically, a ref that `sync` should never write to per its own documented behavior ("Fast-forward trunk" is described as updating the *local* trunk ref to match remote, not pushing to it).
- No `git push` targeting `main` was run manually at any point — every manual `git push` in this session named a specific feature branch explicitly.

## Expected behavior

Per the `gh-stack` README, `sync` step 3 ("Fast-forward trunk") only fast-forwards the **local** trunk ref to match `origin`, and step 4 ("Cascade rebase") rebases stack branches onto their parents. It should never produce a merge commit, and it should never push anything to the trunk ref itself. `sync` should not be able to advance `origin/main` under any circumstances; only a GitHub PR merge should do that.

## Actual behavior

1. For the branch directly based on trunk, the "rebase" step performed a `git merge` of trunk into the branch instead of a rebase (confirmed via reflog entry type), while still reporting it as `"Rebased ... onto main"`.
2. That merge commit was pushed to `origin/main` during the subsequent "Push — pushes all branches" step, even though only the 4 stack branches were named/intended as push targets.
3. `sync` printed full success (`✓ Pushed 4 branches`, `✓ Stack synced`) with no warning, no diff summary, and no indication that a ref outside the 4 stack branches had been written to.
4. This resulted in a stack branch's code landing on the trunk branch of a production repository, completely bypassing that branch's own PR (which GitHub still reported as open/unmerged).

## Impact

This landed code directly on `main` in a production repository, with no error, warning, or confirmation prompt from the tool. For any repo where `main`/trunk is a protected, review-gated branch, this defeats that protection silently.

## Related

- #417 ("gh stack sync reports success after its atomic push fails") documents a related but distinct failure in the same step of `sync` — the atomic push not accurately reflecting/reporting what happened to remote refs. That issue is about a push *failing* while being reported as success; this report is about a push landing somewhere it should never have targeted at all, also reported as success. Both point to the same underlying step ("Push — pushes all branches" in `sync`) having an unreliable relationship between what it does to remote refs and what it tells the user.

## Suggested fix direction

- `sync`'s push step should construct its list of push refspecs explicitly from the known stack branch names only, and should hard-fail (never silently succeed) if a trunk/base ref is ever included in that list or if any pushed ref does not exactly match one of the stack's tracked branch names.
- The "Fast-forward trunk" and "Cascade rebase" steps should be implemented with real `git rebase`, not `git merge`, for the bottom-of-stack branch — and the reflog/commit shape should be asserted in tests to catch exactly this kind of mislabeling.
- Consider printing the actual SHA delta being pushed per branch (old → new) in `sync`'s output, so a trunk-ref write would be visible immediately rather than silent.

Inizia dal passaggio di push di `gh stack sync` e dai relativi punti di ingresso `Fast-forward trunk` e `Cascade rebase`, quindi riproduci lo scenario documentato con uno stack di quattro branch. Il lavoro è completato quando vengono sottoposti a push solo i branch dello stack tracciati, il branch di base usa un vero rebase senza creare un merge commit e qualsiasi discrepanza nella refspec di trunk o nel push fallisce in modo visibile invece di segnalare il successo.

Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.