Bug: Copilot CLI 1.0.82 BYOK silently disables prompt caching (~5x cost)
Dieses Issue hat noch niemand übernommen.
- Vorherrschende Sprache
- Shell
- Sterne
- 11.2k
- Forks
- 1.9k
- Ø Merge
- 14 Std. 16 Min.
- Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
- 6
Beschreibung
Summary
Copilot CLI 1.0.82 in BYOK mode sends chat requests that carry no prompt-cache declaration, so prompt caching is effectively disabled for the whole session. Every turn re-sends the entire growing context at full price — provider usage shows cached_tokens=0 and cache_write/cache_creation_tokens=0 on every request across the session, even though the prefix is stable.
Net effect: ~5x cost for normal multi-turn BYOK sessions.
Setup
- Copilot CLI 1.0.82, BYOK mode (custom OpenAI-compatible
/chat/completionsendpoint serving an Anthropic model,claude-sonnet-5) - Compare baseline: same machine, same endpoint/model, 1.0.80 BYOK → prompt caching works (~97% hit)
- Also tested 1.0.82 in GitHub-subscription mode on the same machine → caching works, so the build is cache-capable
Expected
Once a conversation prefix stabilizes, the provider should report cached_tokens > 0 and small cache_creation_tokens for the new tail (that's what 1.0.80 BYOK and subscription mode report).
Actual
Every request reports zero cache metrics:
"prompt_tokens_details": {
"text_tokens": 146022,
"cached_tokens": 0,
"cache_write_tokens": 0,
"cache_creation_tokens": 0,
"cache_creation_token_details": { "ephemeral_5m_input_tokens": 0 }
},
"cache_read_input_tokens": 0
Over a 150-request session, text_tokens climbed monotonically 118,966 → 285,085 while cached_tokens and cache_write/creation_tokens stayed 0 every time. The zero cache-write/creation is the strong signal: even a cold miss should write the prefix so the next turn can hit; a persistent 0 write means the request never asks for a cache at all.
Evidence
| Metric | 1.0.82 BYOK (broken) | 1.0.80 BYOK (baseline) |
|---|---|---|
| Requests | 150 | 320 |
| Input tokens | 30,075,042 | 100,762,401 |
| Cached tokens | 0 | 98,424,636 |
| Cache hit rate | 0% | 97.7% |
| Cost | $61.21 | $28.92 |
With normal caching, 30.1M input ≈ $11.4; at 0% it costs ≈ $60.2 → ~$49 (~5x) wasted in a single session.
Root-cause hypothesis
The 1.0.82 BYOK request builder omits the prompt-cache declaration (cache_control / ephemeral-cache policy) that subscription mode injects. Because BYOK calls the user's endpoint directly, the missing declaration is only visible to BYOK users.
Severity
High — silent runaway cost on BYOK setups; no CLI error, only a much larger bill. Requires monitoring provider cache hit-rate to detect.
Suggested fix
Make the BYOK path send the same prompt-cache declaration used by subscription mode.
Repro note
I cannot reproduce right now (downgraded to 1.0.80 where caching works). Reproducing requires running 1.0.82 in BYOK against an Anthropic-model endpoint and reading provider cache accounting. Happy to help test a newer build backported if there's a fix candidate.
Beitragsleitfaden
Erste Schritte
- Lies das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
- Schreib ins Issue, dass du es übernimmst — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
- Forke das Repository und arbeite in einem Branch.
- Öffne einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.
Rechercherichtung
Suchen Sie den BYOK request builder und vergleichen Sie seine Request-Konstruktion mit dem subscription path und dem in diesem Issue beschriebenen Verhalten von 1.0.80. Prüfen Sie, ob die prompt-cache declaration vorhanden ist, und führen Sie anschließend eine Multi-Turn-BYOK-Session gegen einen Anthropic-model endpoint aus. Verifizieren Sie, dass die cache-write- und cache-read-Metriken nicht mehr null sind.
Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.
Bewertung
- Tech-Stack
- shell
- Bereich
- api, cli
- Issue-Typ
- Bug
- Schwierigkeit
- 3/5
- Geschätzter Aufwand
- 1-2 Tage
- Aktivitätsstatus
- Aktiv
- Klarheit
- Größtenteils klar
- Anfängerfreundlichkeit
- 55/100