github / github/copilot-cli

Per-agent provider selection for custom agents

Aperta
#4,703 0 commenti 0 reazioni 0 assegnatari Vedi su GitHub

Nessuno ha ancora preso questa issue.

area:agents area:models
Lingua principale
Shell
Stelle
11.2k
Fork
1.9k
Merge medio
14h 16m
PR unite (30g)
6

Descrizione

I know about BYOK (COPILOT_PROVIDER_BASE_URL plus COPILOT_MODEL), /model, and the model field in custom-agent frontmatter. We use all three. None of them lets two agents in one session talk to two different endpoints, because COPILOT_PROVIDER_BASE_URL is process-wide and nothing scopes it to an agent. That is the difference between this and #3624 and copilot-sdk#1545, both closed within hours pointing at the BYOK docs.

The ask

A provider field in custom-agent frontmatter. Or the per-agent env/env_file scoping that #2879 proposes for secrets, which would do the same job. The main agent keeps the session provider. The subagent gets its own base URL.

What the runtime already does

I put a recording HTTP server at COPILOT_PROVIDER_BASE_URL on 1.0.83-3 and dispatched a custom agent through the task tool. Three requests came out of one session:

1  model=local-worker-model  tools=24  main agent
2  model=ROUTE-ME-LOCAL      tools=1   subagent; model from its .agent.md frontmatter,
                                       its own instructions in the system prompt
3  model=local-worker-model  tools=24  main agent

The model override on the task tool arrives the same way. The per-agent model id already reaches the provider, and v1.0.62 ("Keep custom agents on their configured model when using BYOK providers") and v1.0.65 for subagents made that deliberate. What it cannot carry is an endpoint to send that id to.

Use case

A cloud main agent plans and reviews. It hands renames, comment edits, log lines and single-file changes to a subagent running a 27B model on the developer's Mac (MLX, 48 GB). Those tokens cost nothing. I am not claiming the local model matches the cloud one. On our own eight-task benchmark two local models came out indistinguishable from each other, and the only claim I will stand behind is free tokens for mechanical work. Judgement stays in the cloud.

What we tried

A routing proxy at COPILOT_PROVIDER_BASE_URL, keyed on the model id. Known local ids go to the MLX server and the proxy forwards the rest to GitHub. Two problems killed it. It puts the main agent's traffic through GitHub endpoints that are not documented for that use. And the docs say "A declared model or effort that can't be honored falls back to the session's value instead of failing the dispatch", so any proxy error on a local id sends that task to the session model instead. You find out from the bill rather than from an error.

Related

  • #2879 asks for per-agent env:/env_file: to isolate secrets. Same mechanism, different reason for wanting it.
  • #2728 asks for per-agent LSP config, so per-agent configuration beyond model is a shape this project already accepts.
  • #3709, #3282, #1354, #2554 and #2758 want the model version of this. A commenter on #3709 already asked for subagents to use the other models a provider offers.
  • copilot-sdk#1544 named routing subagent tasks to a local endpoint. Its author closed it 14 minutes later while still investigating, and nobody from GitHub replied.

Guida per i contributori

Apri la guida per i contributori

Come iniziare

  1. Leggi tutta la issue e poi la guida ai contributi del progetto.
  2. Commenta sulla issue per dire che te ne occupi tu — evita che due persone facciano lo stesso lavoro.
  3. Fai un fork del repository e lavora su un branch.
  4. Apri una pull request che faccia riferimento al numero della issue.

Direzione di ricerca

Inizia dal percorso di dispatch di task tool e dalla gestione di custom-agent frontmatter, quindi traccia come COPILOT_PROVIDER_BASE_URL a livello di sessione e il modello per agente raggiungono il provider. Definisci come un subagent seleziona il proprio endpoint mentre l’agente principale mantiene il provider della sessione, e verifica che una sessione contenente entrambi gli agent instradi correttamente le richieste senza confusione dovuta ai fallback.

Scritto dal modello di indicizzazione a partire dal testo della issue.

Valutazione

Ambito
ai, cli
Tipo di issue
Funzionalità
Difficoltà
5/5
Tempo stimato
Più di una settimana
Stato di attività
Attiva
Chiarezza
Abbastanza chiara
Idoneità per principianti
45/100

Ricevi le nuove issue nella tua casella

Un breve riepilogo di issue GitHub adatte ai principianti.