github / github/copilot-cli

Per-agent provider selection for custom agents

Open
#4,703 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

area:agents area:models
Dominant language
Shell
Stars
11.2k
Forks
1.9k
Avg merge
14h 16m
Merged PRs (30d)
6

Description

I know about BYOK (COPILOT_PROVIDER_BASE_URL plus COPILOT_MODEL), /model, and the model field in custom-agent frontmatter. We use all three. None of them lets two agents in one session talk to two different endpoints, because COPILOT_PROVIDER_BASE_URL is process-wide and nothing scopes it to an agent. That is the difference between this and #3624 and copilot-sdk#1545, both closed within hours pointing at the BYOK docs.

The ask

A provider field in custom-agent frontmatter. Or the per-agent env/env_file scoping that #2879 proposes for secrets, which would do the same job. The main agent keeps the session provider. The subagent gets its own base URL.

What the runtime already does

I put a recording HTTP server at COPILOT_PROVIDER_BASE_URL on 1.0.83-3 and dispatched a custom agent through the task tool. Three requests came out of one session:

1  model=local-worker-model  tools=24  main agent
2  model=ROUTE-ME-LOCAL      tools=1   subagent; model from its .agent.md frontmatter,
                                       its own instructions in the system prompt
3  model=local-worker-model  tools=24  main agent

The model override on the task tool arrives the same way. The per-agent model id already reaches the provider, and v1.0.62 ("Keep custom agents on their configured model when using BYOK providers") and v1.0.65 for subagents made that deliberate. What it cannot carry is an endpoint to send that id to.

Use case

A cloud main agent plans and reviews. It hands renames, comment edits, log lines and single-file changes to a subagent running a 27B model on the developer's Mac (MLX, 48 GB). Those tokens cost nothing. I am not claiming the local model matches the cloud one. On our own eight-task benchmark two local models came out indistinguishable from each other, and the only claim I will stand behind is free tokens for mechanical work. Judgement stays in the cloud.

What we tried

A routing proxy at COPILOT_PROVIDER_BASE_URL, keyed on the model id. Known local ids go to the MLX server and the proxy forwards the rest to GitHub. Two problems killed it. It puts the main agent's traffic through GitHub endpoints that are not documented for that use. And the docs say "A declared model or effort that can't be honored falls back to the session's value instead of failing the dispatch", so any proxy error on a local id sends that task to the session model instead. You find out from the bill rather than from an error.

Related

  • #2879 asks for per-agent env:/env_file: to isolate secrets. Same mechanism, different reason for wanting it.
  • #2728 asks for per-agent LSP config, so per-agent configuration beyond model is a shape this project already accepts.
  • #3709, #3282, #1354, #2554 and #2758 want the model version of this. A commenter on #3709 already asked for subagents to use the other models a provider offers.
  • copilot-sdk#1544 named routing subagent tasks to a local endpoint. Its author closed it 14 minutes later while still investigating, and nobody from GitHub replied.

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start with the task tool dispatch path and custom-agent frontmatter handling, then trace how the session-wide COPILOT_PROVIDER_BASE_URL and per-agent model reach the provider. Define how a subagent selects its own endpoint while the main agent keeps the session provider, and verify a session containing both agents routes requests correctly without fallback confusion.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Domain
ai, cli
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Active
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
45/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.