Google Workspace MCP OAuth fails on accounts.google.com trailing-slash issuer mismatch

Describe the bug

Native HTTP MCP authentication fails for Google's official Workspace MCP
endpoints before the browser authorization flow begins.

The protected-resource metadata advertises this authorization server:

https://accounts.google.com/

Google's authorization-server/OpenID metadata advertises this issuer:

https://accounts.google.com

These URLs differ only by the trailing slash on the origin root, but Copilot CLI
compares them literally and rejects the server:

OAuth authentication failed for google-calendar: MCPOAuthError:
Incompatible authorization server: authorization server advertised an issuer
that does not match the URL its metadata was discovered from (RFC 8414 §3.3);
refusing to connect

This affects all seven currently documented Google Workspace MCP endpoints:

• Calendar: https://calendarmcp.googleapis.com/mcp/v1
• Gmail: https://gmailmcp.googleapis.com/mcp/v1
• Drive: https://drivemcp.googleapis.com/mcp/v1
• People: https://people.googleapis.com/mcp/v1
• Docs: https://docsmcp.googleapis.com/mcp/v1
• Slides: https://slidesmcp.googleapis.com/mcp/v1
• Sheets: https://sheetsmcp.googleapis.com/mcp/v1

Each endpoint's protected-resource metadata currently returns:

{
  "resource": "<the MCP endpoint>",
  "authorization_servers": ["https://accounts.google.com/"]
}

Google's public metadata returns:

GET https://accounts.google.com/.well-known/openid-configuration

{
  "issuer": "https://accounts.google.com"
}

Affected version

GitHub Copilot CLI 1.0.81-10

Steps to reproduce the behavior

1. Register the localhost OAuth redirect URI required by Google and configure
   Calendar as a native HTTP MCP server (credentials redacted):

   {
     "mcpServers": {
       "google-calendar": {
         "type": "http",
         "url": "https://calendarmcp.googleapis.com/mcp/v1",
         "oauthClientId": "<redacted>",
         "auth": {
           "clientSecret": "<redacted>",
           "redirectPort": 8080
         }
       }
     }
   }
   

2. Start Copilot CLI.

3. Run /mcp auth google-calendar.

4. Authentication fails with the RFC 8414 issuer-mismatch error above. The
   browser consent flow never starts.

The same behavior occurs with the other Google Workspace MCP endpoints.

Expected behavior

Copilot CLI should be able to authenticate with Google's official Workspace MCP
endpoints.

Ideally, the implementation would preserve strict issuer validation while
canonicalizing only semantically equivalent origin-root URLs before selecting
the discovery issuer (or otherwise handling the empty-path/trailing-slash
equivalence safely). If that is not acceptable under the CLI's RFC 8414
validation policy, the error should identify the two compared values and
provide an actionable, narrowly scoped compatibility option.

Additional context

• OS: macOS 26.6
• Architecture: Apple Silicon (arm64)
• Terminal: iTerm2
• Shell: zsh

A pinned mcp-remote@0.2.4 stdio proxy using the same endpoint, OAuth client,
redirect URI, and Google account completes the OAuth flow successfully and can
call the Google tools. This confirms the client registration, consent, token
exchange, scopes, and MCP endpoints are functional; the failure is specific to
Copilot CLI's native HTTP MCP OAuth discovery/issuer validation.

Related reports:

• #4480 covers an Atlassian hostname mismatch.
• #4439 covers malformed GitLab protected-resource metadata and fallback
  discovery.

This Google case is distinct: the protected-resource metadata uses the
RFC 9728 resource string and authorization_servers array correctly, and the
issuer differs only by a trailing slash at the authorization server's root.

Comece reproduzindo /mcp auth google-calendar com o Calendar MCP endpoint documentado e inspecione o caminho nativo de discovery e validação do issuer do HTTP MCP OAuth. Compare a URL do servidor de autorização do recurso protegido com o issuer descoberto e, em seguida, verifique se a autenticação é bem-sucedida para os endpoints do Google sem enfraquecer a validação geral do issuer, ou se qualquer falha de compatibilidade relata claramente ambos os valores.