github / github/copilot-cli

Extension SDK reconnects dispose the session hook processor: "Hook processor is not configured for session id"

Offen
#4,590 2 Kommentare 0 Reaktionen 0 zugewiesene Personen Auf GitHub ansehen

Dieses Issue hat noch niemand übernommen.

area:plugins area:sessions
Vorherrschende Sprache
Shell
Sterne
11.2k
Forks
1.9k
Ø Merge
14 Std. 16 Min.
Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
6

Beschreibung

Describe the bug

When more than one extension is active, every MCP host reload restarts the entire extension cohort. Each restarting extension calls session.resume on the same session. Tearing down an extension's SDK connection disposes the session's hook processor:

[DEBUG] [rust:hooks] disposing owned hook processor {"processor_id":"b28e360b-…","reason":"SDK connection removed"}

The hook processor appears to be owned by a single SDK connection rather than by the session. So once it is disposed, the next extension's session.resume fails and that extension dies during startup:

[extension-bootstrap] Failed to load extension: Error: Request session.resume failed with message:
  GenericFailure, Hook processor is not configured for session id: <session-id>
=== peer-closed-before-ready ===
=== exit code=1 disposition=startup-failure ===

The CLI restarts the failed extension, which resumes again, which removes another connection — a restart loop.

If the final disposal leaves no hook processor registered, the session is left permanently without one. The next user prompt then fails:

[DEBUG] [rust:copilot_runtime::session::turn_user_message] userPromptSubmitted hook skipped:
  GenericFailure, Hook processor is not configured for session id: <session-id>

In the TUI this surfaces as a hard failure and the submitted prompt is discarded:

✗ Execution failed: GenericFailure, Hook processor is not configured for session id: <session-id>

The session must be restarted, and there is no indication which component failed.

Affected version
GitHub Copilot CLI 1.0.81-9
Steps to reproduce the behavior
  1. Have several extensions active in one session. In my case four: one user extension (~/.copilot/extensions/), one project extension (<repo>/.github/extensions/), and two contributed by an installed plugin. A sizeable MCP/plugin set makes it far more likely, because that is what drives the reloads (mine: 13 MCP servers, 12 plugins, 19 hooks).
  2. Start an interactive session — either fresh or with --session-id=<uuid> / --resume=<uuid>.
  3. Watch the process log. Startup issues one MCP host start (trigger=startup) followed by repeated MCP host reload requested (trigger=mcp_reload | plugin_change). I counted 6 reloads within 100 seconds of startup.
  4. Each reload relaunches every extension. In the extension log directory this appears as repeated launches of the same extensions with new PIDs, a few seconds apart. Over one ~100 s run: 14 extension launches for 4 extensions.
  5. Grep the process log for disposing owned hook processor — it appears once per lost SDK connection.
  6. Wait for the reload storm to settle (~1 minute), then submit any prompt.
  7. The prompt fails with Execution failed: GenericFailure, Hook processor is not configured for session id: ….

Timing matters, and I think it explains why this is intermittent: in two runs where I submitted the prompt at roughly t+20 s — before the disposals — the prompt succeeded and the log showed no userPromptSubmitted hook skipped. The failing run submitted at t+5 min, after the last disposal, and failed.

Expected behavior
  • The hook processor should be scoped to the session, not to whichever SDK connection happened to create it. Losing one extension's connection should not remove hook processing for the session as a whole.
  • Failing that, a subsequent session.resume on a session with no hook processor should re-register one instead of returning GenericFailure.
  • An extension that fails session.resume should not enter an unbounded restart loop.
  • A missing hook processor should degrade gracefully. The runtime already logs this as userPromptSubmitted hook skipped at DEBUG — "skipped" implies non-fatal — yet the TUI reports it as a hard Execution failed and drops the user's prompt.
Additional context

Environment

  • Windows 11, x86_64
  • Windows Terminal, PowerShell 7
  • copilot 1.0.81-9, installed via npm
  • 13 MCP servers connected, 12 enabled plugins, 19 hooks
  • 4 extensions: 1 user-level, 1 project-level, 2 plugin-contributed

Observed cascade, single process log (timestamps UTC):

18:46:44  Workspace initialized: <session-id> (checkpoints: 14)
18:46:50  loadDeferredRepoHooks(<session-id>): loaded repo hooks (hookCount=19)
18:46:50  MCP host start (trigger=startup, …)
18:46:53  MCP host reload requested (trigger=plugin_change)
18:46:53  MCP host reload requested (trigger=mcp_reload)
18:46:54  Received session.resume request: {"sessionId":"<session-id>", …}   <- extension A
18:47:19  Received session.resume request: {"sessionId":"<session-id>", …}   <- extension B
18:47:19  Cleaned up event forwarding for session <session-id>
18:47:24  Received session.resume request: {"sessionId":"<session-id>", …}   <- extension C
18:47:24  Cleaned up event forwarding for session <session-id>
18:47:26  Received session.resume request: {"sessionId":"<session-id>", …}   <- extension D
18:47:26  Cleaned up event forwarding for session <session-id>
18:47:29  [rust:hooks] disposing owned hook processor {"reason":"SDK connection removed"}
18:47:49  [rust:hooks] disposing owned hook processor {"reason":"SDK connection removed"}
…
18:51:57  userPromptSubmitted hook skipped: GenericFailure,
          Hook processor is not configured for session id: <session-id>

Extension restart waves. All four extensions launch together, all reach === ready ===, all exit code=1, then relaunch. On the following wave some fail outright:

time extension reached ready exit
13:59:23 all 4 yes code=1 disposition=stopped-normally
13:59:52 plugin ext no code=1 disposition=startup-failure (session.resume failed)
13:59:52 project ext no code=1 disposition=startup-failure (session.resume failed)
13:59:56 all 4 yes code=1 disposition=stopped-normally
14:00:10 project ext no code=1 disposition=startup-failure (session.resume failed)

Attempted workaround that did not help. Reducing the active extensions from 4 to 2 (disabling the plugin that contributes two of them) still produced 2 hook processor disposals in the same 100 s window. Fewer participants narrows the race but does not close it.

Possibly the same root cause as the repeated reload notices. The reload storm that drives these restarts also surfaces as several consecutive

MCP Servers reloaded: N servers connected

notices during startup, which is what first drew my attention. The message is emitted only when the reload reason is not startup; in my logs the extra reloads carry trigger=mcp_reload and trigger=plugin_change. If plugin/extension registration settled before the MCP host finished its initial start, both symptoms would likely disappear together.

One further detail that may be relevant: on the second MCP host start, the log shows pluginFingerprint=undefined, whereas the initial startup call carries a real fingerprint. If that fingerprint is what would normally short-circuit an unchanged reload, losing it may be what makes each reload do a full teardown and restart.

Beitragsleitfaden

Beitragsleitfaden öffnen

Erste Schritte

  1. Lies das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
  2. Schreib ins Issue, dass du es übernimmst — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
  3. Forke das Repository und arbeite in einem Branch.
  4. Öffne einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.

Rechercherichtung

Verfolge den Lebenszyklus von session.resume parallel zu MCP-Host-Neuladungen, der Entfernung von SDK-Verbindungen, der Freigabe des Hook-Prozessors und dem userPromptSubmitted-Hook. Reproduziere die Neustartwelle mit mehreren aktiven Erweiterungen und untersuche die Prozess- und Erweiterungsprotokolle. Erledigt ist die Aufgabe, wenn der Verlust einer Verbindung weder die Hook-Verarbeitung der Sitzung unterbricht noch eine unbeschränkte Neustartschleife auslöst und ein fehlender Prozessor keinen Prompt verwirft.

Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.

Bewertung

Bereich
cli, tooling
Issue-Typ
Bug
Schwierigkeit
4/5
Geschätzter Aufwand
3-5 Tage
Aktivitätsstatus
Aktiv
Klarheit
Größtenteils klar
Anfängerfreundlichkeit
52/100

Neue Issues direkt in Ihr Postfach

Eine kurze Übersicht über anfängerfreundliche GitHub-Issues.