Copilot CLI 1.0.81 forces sandbox while managed policy is undetermined, overriding sandbox.enabled=false
还没有人认领这个 Issue。
- 主要语言
- Shell
- 星标
- 11.2k
- 派生
- 1.9k
- 平均合并
- 14 小时 16 分钟
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 6
描述
Describe the bug
Copilot CLI 1.0.81-1 enables the local sandbox while server-managed policy is temporarily undetermined, even when the user explicitly configured "sandbox": { "enabled": false }, device MDM contains no sandbox settings, no file-based managed settings exist, and sandboxing was never enabled interactively.
The provisional managed-policy fail-closed state overrides the local false setting and forces shell, local MCP, and LSP processes into Windows MXC. MXC cannot initialize on this host, so those tools fail. The session does not recover after policy resolution later succeeds. The same machine, account, configuration, repository, and prompt work on 1.0.80-1.
This appears to be a Copilot CLI managed-settings startup/recovery regression, not a request to troubleshoot MXC after intentional sandbox activation.
Affected version
GitHub Copilot CLI 1.0.81-1. The backend failure was also observed in payload 1.0.81-0.
Controlled comparison: 1.0.81-1 versus 1.0.80-1.
Steps to reproduce the behavior
Environment
- Windows 11 Enterprise 25H2 build 26200.9106, x64
- Node.js v24.18.1
- PowerShell / Windows Terminal
- Copilot authenticated through GitHub CLI
gh auth token --hostname github.comsucceeds directly- Device MDM has unrelated
remoteControlsettings only; nosandbox.*values %ProgramFiles%\GitHubCopilot\managed-settings.jsonis absent- User settings include
experimental: trueandsandbox.enabled: false - The issue also reproduces with
--no-experimental
Reproduction command
copilot --allow-all --no-remote --output-format text -p "Use the shell tool to run: git status --short. Report only SHELL_OK if the command executes, otherwise report the exact failure."
The observed tool label is (sandboxed shell), followed by:
GenericFailure, backend_unavailable: BaseContainer is unavailable; DACL fallback requires write-DAC permission on 'C:\Program Files\nodejs', which the current user lacks (ERROR_ACCESS_DENIED (WRITE_DAC not granted)).
Explicit sandbox.enabled: false does not prevent activation. The same behavior occurs with --no-experimental.
Sanitized startup sequence
[DEBUG] [auth::gh] GitHub CLI authenticated with valid token
[DEBUG] [auth::gh] gh auth token exited non-zero {exit_code: Some(1), stderr: no oauth token found for https://github.com}
[INFO] [managedSettings] device MDM policy loaded: bypassDisabled=false, keys=[remoteControl]
[INFO] [managedSettings] no token available to fetch server policy — failing closed (bypass stays disabled until policy is known)
[INFO] [managedSettings] effective policy resolved: source=mdm, bypassDisabled=false, serverFetchFailed=true
[WARNING] [managedSettings] sandbox floor only partially determined (serverUndetermined=true, deviceLoadFailed=false, deviceSandboxUndetermined=false): no usable token for the selected account
[INFO] [managedSettings] applied: bypass-permissions mode DISABLED by enterprise policy (fail-closed: policy could not be determined) — /allow-all and permission escalation are now blocked
mcp apply_session_settings {sandbox_changed:true, policy_already_applied:true, has_managed_settings:true}
[INFO] [sandbox_spawn] sandbox launch directory: <working-directory>
The local MCP server fails for the same reason: BaseContainer is unavailable, and DACL fallback requires WRITE_DAC on C:\Program Files\nodejs. Its error message states that organization policy requires MCP sandboxing.
Later initialization sees a valid token and confirms that device policy permits bypass, but the existing session remains sandboxed. This exposes an internal inconsistency: the process reports valid GitHub CLI authentication, then the managed-settings lookup claims the GitHub CLI token is unavailable, while the exact gh auth token --hostname github.com command succeeds outside Copilot.
Expected behavior
sandbox.enabled: falseremains effective unless a resolved managed policy requires sandboxing.- A provisional managed floor is reversible after policy resolution.
- Startup gates shell, MCP, and LSP until managed policy resolution instead of racing their initialization.
- UI and logs describe the state as provisional rather than claiming a real organization requirement.
- An unavailable Windows sandbox backend does not destroy sessions because of a policy that was never configured.
Additional context
1.0.80-1 control
The directly retained 1.0.80-1 payload succeeds:
node "$HOME\.copilot\pkg\win32-x64\1.0.80-1\index.js" --allow-all --no-auto-update --no-remote --output-format text -p "Use the shell tool to run: git status --short. Report only SHELL_OK if the command executes, otherwise report the exact failure."
It displays ordinary (shell) and returns SHELL_OK. Multiple interactive 1.0.80-1 sessions work without BaseContainer failures.
Impact and recovery evidence
All concurrently launched development sessions lost shell, search, MCP, and LSP. --allow-all, --no-experimental, and explicit local false did not help. Pinning 1.0.80-1 was the only reliable recovery.
During an attempted issue filing, /sandbox disable temporarily worked, but a managed-settings refresh re-enabled the sandbox before the next tool invocation.
Related but not duplicates
- #4419: interim managed-settings fail-closed permanently drops MCP servers
- #4433: fail-closed permission revocation; self-closed without resolution
- #3849: MXC failure after intentional sandbox enable; this report concerns involuntary activation
贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
调研方向
首先跟踪 managedSettings 在 mcp apply_session_settings 和 sandbox_spawn 周围的启动与恢复流程,然后将 1.0.81-1 的行为与保留的 1.0.80-1 index.js 入口点进行比较。使用 sandbox.enabled=false 重现该命令,并验证除非解析后的 policy 要求进行 sandboxing,否则本地设置仍然有效;验证 policy 解析可以恢复 session;并验证 shell、MCP 和 LSP 的初始化不再与其发生竞争。
由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。
评估
- 技术栈
- node.js, shell
- 领域
- cli, operating-systems, security
- Issue 类型
- 缺陷
- 难度
- 4/5
- 预计耗时
- 3-5 天
- 活跃度
- 活跃
- 描述清晰度
- 基本清楚
- 新手友好度
- 52/100