Enterprise MCP registry unreachable on macOS: rustls rejects private CA cert (Apple -67901), fail-closed blocks all MCP
Dieses Issue hat noch niemand übernommen.
- Vorherrschende Sprache
- Shell
- Sterne
- 11.2k
- Forks
- 1.9k
- Ø Merge
- 14 Std. 16 Min.
- Gemergte PRs (30 T.)
- 6
Beschreibung
Describe the bug
On macOS, Copilot CLI 1.0.78 fails to validate MCP servers against an enterprise custom MCP registry because TLS verification rejects the registry's private-CA certificate with Apple error -67901 (certificate is not standards compliant).
The CLI then treats the registry as unreachable and fail-closes: all non-default / custom MCP servers are reported as blocked by policy, even though:
- the registry is reachable over HTTPS from the same machine (
curl/ Nodefetchreturn HTTP 200) - Chrome trusts and displays the certificate without issue
- the same servers are listed in the enterprise registry and were usable with an earlier CLI version (allowlist check previously went through the Node/JS path)
This looks like a regression from moving the MCP registry allowlist HTTP client into the Rust runtime (reqwest + rustls-platform-verifier / Apple Security.framework), which applies stricter Apple TLS rules than Node/Chrome.
Affected version
- GitHub Copilot CLI 1.0.78 (auto-updated ~2026-08-03 / 2026-08-04)
- macOS 26.x (Apple Silicon)
- Enterprise / org Copilot policy: custom MCP Registry URL + Registry only allowlist
Previously worked on an earlier 1.x CLI where registry allowlist verification still lived in the JS/app.js path (Node TLS). After 1.0.78, the same check appears in the native runtime (rustls_platform_verifier::verification::apple) and fails.
Steps to reproduce
- Configure an org/enterprise Copilot MCP registry URL pointing at an internal HTTPS registry (private PKI), with Restrict MCP access to registry servers = Registry only.
- Add one or more registry-listed MCP servers to
~/.copilot/mcp-config.json(or via/mcp add). - Start Copilot CLI with
--log-level debug(or run/mcp reload). - Observe custom MCP servers blocked by policy.
Expected behavior
- Registry HTTPS fetch should succeed for a certificate that the OS / Chrome / Node already trust for that host, or
- If Apple TLS policy rejects the leaf (e.g. validity period), the CLI should surface a clear TLS/certificate error (not a generic “blocked by policy”), and ideally provide a documented enterprise path (fail-open option, private-CA guidance, or less strict verification for admin-configured registry URLs).
Actual behavior
User-facing:
! 3 MCP servers were blocked by policy: '<server-a>', '<server-b>', '<server-c>'
Debug log (redacted host):
[DEBUG] Registry https://<REDACTED-INTERNAL-REGISTRY>/: servers will be verified against this registry
[DEBUG] starting new connection 'Some("<REDACTED-INTERNAL-REGISTRY>")'
[ERROR] failed to verify TLS certificate: invalid peer certificate: Other(OtherError("“*.<REDACTED-INTERNAL-DOMAIN>” certificate is not standards compliant: -67901"))
log.target=rustls_platform_verifier::verification::apple
[DEBUG] Registry https://<REDACTED-INTERNAL-REGISTRY>/ unreachable when checking server "<server-id>" after 3 attempts:
error sending request for url (https://<REDACTED-INTERNAL-REGISTRY>/v0.1/servers/<server-id>/versions/latest)
[ERROR] MCP server "<server-id>" filtered: Registry https://<REDACTED-INTERNAL-REGISTRY>/ was unreachable
Telemetry kinds observed: mcp_policy_check, mcp_allowlist_policy_check.
Same host from the same machine:
curl→ TLS OK, HTTP 200 on/v0/serversand/v0.1/servers- Node
fetch→ OK - Chrome certificate viewer → trusts leaf issued by internal CA
Certificate details (redacted)
- Subject CN / SAN:
*.<REDACTED-INTERNAL-DOMAIN> - Issuer: internal enterprise PKI (private CA)
- Validity window: ~1095 days (issued Jan 2026 → expires Jan 2029)
- Apple trusted-certificate guidance requires leaf validity ≤ 825 days for certs issued after 2019 — this is the likely trigger for
-67901/ “not standards compliant” - Fingerprint available privately if needed; hostnames intentionally redacted
Additional context / analysis
Local package comparison on disk:
| CLI package | Allowlist / registry verify strings | TLS stack for that check |
|---|---|---|
| 1.0.58 / 1.0.59 / 1.0.61 | Present in app.js |
Node |
| 1.0.78 | Present in runtime.node, removed from app.js |
Rust + rustls_platform_verifier (Apple) |
So this is not “registry down” and not (yet) an identity fingerprint mismatch (does not match the registered server identity). The allowlist never reaches a successful registry HTTP response.
Related but distinct issues: #2481 / #2498 (policy fetch 404), #3934 (identity mismatch), #4346 (403 in CI). This report is specifically TLS verification of the enterprise registry URL on macOS after the Rust migration.
Asks
- Confirm whether enterprise MCP registry fetches are intentionally pinned to
rustls-platform-verifieron macOS. - Improve error UX: distinguish TLS/cert rejection from policy deny / true unreachability.
- Consider enterprise-friendly options: honor OS trust more like Chrome for admin-configured registry URLs, document Apple 825-day constraint for private PKI, or provide a supported workaround short of reissuing certs / switching policy to Allow all.
- Optionally fail-open (or cache last-good registry allowlist) when the configured registry URL fails TLS, similar to other managed-settings fail-open work in 1.0.78 — today MCP custom servers are hard-blocked.
Happy to provide more info if needed!
Beitragsleitfaden
Erste Schritte
- Lies das ganze Issue und danach den Beitragsleitfaden des Projekts.
- Schreib ins Issue, dass du es übernimmst — das erspart doppelte Arbeit.
- Forke das Repository und arbeite in einem Branch.
- Öffne einen Pull Request, der die Issue-Nummer nennt.
Rechercherichtung
Vergleiche die Registry-Verifizierungspfade in app.js und runtime.node und verfolge dann den macOS-Fehler durch rustls_platform_verifier::verification::apple. Reproduziere den Fall einer privaten CA mit Debug-Logging und unterscheide zwischen Zertifikatsablehnung und Richtlinienverweigerung; abgeschlossen ist die Aufgabe, wenn der Fehler korrekt offengelegt wird und jede unterstützte Behandlung für Unternehmen dokumentiert oder durch das vom Issue gewählte Design abgedeckt ist.
Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.
Bewertung
- Tech-Stack
- macos, node.js, rust
- Bereich
- cli, networking, security
- Issue-Typ
- Bug
- Schwierigkeit
- 4/5
- Geschätzter Aufwand
- 3-5 Tage
- Aktivitätsstatus
- Ruhig
- Klarheit
- Größtenteils klar
- Anfängerfreundlichkeit
- 42/100