github / github/copilot-cli

Claude Sonnet 5 delegated to a lesser agent to perform a code review

未關閉
#4,270 0 則留言 0 個 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 檢視
area:agents area:models
主要語言
Shell
星號
11.2k
分支
1.9k
平均合併
14 小時 16 分鐘
30 天內合併 PR
6

描述

### Describe the bug

I asked Claude Sonnet 5 to perform a code review. I specifically chose Claude Sonnet 5 for deep reasoning. The agent proceeded to review the structure of my project and then delegate to a lesser agent:

"Good, all directories exist. I'll launch a general-purpose agent to perform this code review, since it involves reading through before/after/project directories, comparing changes, and producing a structured markdown report — genuinely multi-step work."

"General-purpose(gpt-5.4) Perform code review for issue 44206"

The code review produced was of little use. I corrected the agent and requested Sonnet 5 to perform the review itself:

"I would like to start this code review over. I see that you delegated to gpt-5.4 and I do not want a weaker model doing the review. Please execute the review prompt in file 44206-review-prompt2.txt."

Sonnet replied "I'll perform this review myself directly (no sub-agent delegation this time). Let me examine the before/after directories to identify actual changed files."

Sonnet completed the review the second time and the quality was as expected.

### Affected version

GitHub Copilot CLI 1.0.75

### Steps to reproduce the behavior

_No response_

### Expected behavior

I expected that when selecting the agent that it perform the work itself.

### Additional context

_No response_

貢獻指南

開啟貢獻指南

研究方向

使用 review 情境和 44206-review-prompt2.txt prompt,在 GitHub Copilot CLI 1.0.75 中重現該行為,並比較 before、after 和 project 目錄。追蹤選取的 agent 在何處決定進行委派,然後確認 Sonnet 會自行執行要求的 review,而不會意外轉交給能力較低的 agent。

由索引模型根據 Issue 內容生成。

評估

技術堆疊
github, shell
領域
ai, cli
Issue 類型
缺陷
難度
4/5
預估耗時
3-5 天
活躍度
冷清
描述清晰度
基本清楚
新手友好度
42/100

把新 issue 寄到你的電子郵件信箱

精選適合新手參與的 GitHub issue 摘要。