Choose model for accepted plan for autopilot
- Langage dominant
- Shell
- Étoiles
- 11.2k
- Forks
- 1.9k
- Merge moyen
- 14 h 16 min
- PR mergées (30 j)
- 6
Description
### Describe the feature or problem you'd like to solve
I frequently plan on a thinking model and prefer a non-thinking one for implementation
### Proposed solution
Avoid wasting 3x due to the incredibly convenient default choice :)
The proposed solution would offer (on first run):
```
1. Accept plan and build on autopilot (recommended) - Claude Opus 4.6
2. Accept plan and build on autopilot with another model
3. Exit plan mode and I will prompt myself
4. Suggest changes
```
> [!IMPORTANT]
> On **1.** the current model that would be used for autopilot should be clearly shown, since otherwise there's no way to see which one will do the coding
Upon choosing 2., the user would get the same model picker as if they had run `/model`. This selection would be persisted as a preference (for going from Plan > Autopilot).
Next time they run in plan mode, the options would now be:
```
1. Accept plan and build on autopilot (recommended) - [LAST SELECTED MODEL]
2. Accept plan and build on autopilot - Claude Opus 4.6
3. Accept plan and build on autopilot with another model
4. Exit plan mode and I will prompt myself
5. Suggest changes
```
> [!NOTE]
> Now option **2.**, just like **1** before, shows the current model being used in plan mode as a fixed choice too for convenience.
In my case, I'd likely choose my desired autopilot model once and then go from Plan > Autopilot without thinking after that.
### Example prompts or workflows
_No response_
### Additional context
_No response_
Guide de contribution
Ouvrir le guide de contribution
Piste de recherche
Commencez par suivre le flux de Plan vers Autopilot et le picker /model existant. Définissez comment les choix proposés affichent les modèles actuels et enregistrés, comment la sélection est conservée et quel comportement doit être vérifié lors du passage de Plan à Autopilot.
Rédigé par le modèle d'indexation à partir du texte de l'issue.
Évaluation
- Stack technique
- shell
- Domaine
- cli
- Type d'issue
- Fonctionnalité
- Difficulté
- 5/5
- Temps estimé
- Plus d'une semaine
- Activité
- Calme
- Clarté
- Plutôt claire
- Accessibilité débutants
- 45/100