Missing "Cross-window communication with unrestricted target origin" because of wrapping by (javascript) blockstatement

Hi,

I am using CodeQL 2.20.6, there is the code:
```js
// {
const t = {};
const r = localStorage.getItem("pw_uuid");
r && JSON.parse(r).data && (t.uuid = JSON.parse(r).data);
window.parent.postMessage(JSON.stringify({
type: "_pwUserDataReady",
key: "",
data: t
}), "*");
// }
```
Where CodeQL should give me a "Cross-window communication with unrestricted target origin" alert but it doesn't.

If I remove the first and last line comments, i.e., wrapping by a block as the code is:
```js
{
const t = {};
const r = localStorage.getItem("pw_uuid");
r && JSON.parse(r).data && (t.uuid = JSON.parse(r).data);
window.parent.postMessage(JSON.stringify({
type: "_pwUserDataReady",
key: "",
data: t
}), "*");
}
```

It does give me one:
```csv
"Cross-window communication with unrestricted target origin", "When sending sensitive information to another window using `postMessage`, the origin of the target window should be restricted to avoid unintentional information leaks.", "error","[[""Sensitive data""|""relative:///iframe.js:3:15:3:45""]] is sent to another window without origin restriction.","/iframe.js", "5", "31", "9", "6"
```

This issue looks the same with but it should be fixed in 2.20.6, shouldn't it?

Reproduce the report in CodeQL 2.20.6 using the two JavaScript variants, with and without the block wrapper, and compare the results at the reported /iframe.js locations. Read related issue #18652 for context. Done means the unrestricted postMessage is reported in both forms, or the supported limitation is documented.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.