github / github/codeql

C++ view AST / printAST.ql performance analysis

Open
#11,221 1 comment 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
question
Dominant language
CodeQL
Stars
10.1k
Forks
2.1k
Avg merge
2d 15h
Merged PRs (30d)
141

Description

Is there anything the end user can do to triage extremely slow 24hr+ printAST requests? It's for a single file that has an include that relies on a lot of other compilation units. The 'db-cpp' folder is 92GB - creating a smaller slice with only this file and required compilation units wouldn't make it any faster, I think, as this query should only be accessing data related to this file to begin with? If that's a valid approach to improve this query's perf - is there an easy way to slice the existing DB or does a new build need to be run with some arg?

"Iteration 30-32" took ~4hrs each doing something similar to `DumpDeclaration::getTemplateArgumentsString`. Java has an 8gb heap and pegs a single core. Is there some preferred tracing for codeql's java components I can capture?

Reason I'm trying to view AST is just so that I don't have to guess at how the code flow I'm looking at is represented by codeql 😄

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

Assessment

This issue has not been assessed yet.

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.