It looks like worktrees are implicitly created for sessions.
- Vorherrschende Sprache
- Keine Sprachdaten
- Sterne
- 2.1k
- Forks
- 153
- PR-Merge-Kennzahlen
- Keine gemergten PRs in 30 T.
Beschreibung
It looks like worktrees are implicitly created for sessions. I think that there should be some prompt, at least the first time, to ask what branch the worktree should be created from.
For example, I was working my local dotnet/roslyn repo, which has both `origin` and `upstream` remotes. My `origin/master` branch is from ~2021. I think `upstream` has no `master` branch--we migrated from `master`->`main` naming. So I was super confused when the agent could not find stuff that I expected to be there.
If it had just asked me first (possibly recommending a default), what branch/ref to create the worktree off of, then the confusion could have been avoided.
---
| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| App version | 1.1.3 |
| OS | Windows 10.0.26200 |
| Theme | GitHub |
| Path | /chat |
| Tenure | Day 1 |
Beitragsleitfaden
Rechercherichtung
Start by tracing the session flow that implicitly creates worktrees, then reproduce it with a repository that has multiple remotes and differing default branches. Check how branch/ref selection is currently determined. Done means the first relevant session prompts for the worktree base branch or ref, with a clear default, and avoids silently choosing an unexpected branch.
Vom Indexierungsmodell aus dem Issue-Text verfasst.
Bewertung
- Tech-Stack
- git
- Bereich
- desktop, developer-experience, tooling
- Issue-Typ
- Feature
- Schwierigkeit
- 4/5
- Geschätzter Aufwand
- 3-5 Tage
- Aktivitätsstatus
- Ruhig
- Klarheit
- Größtenteils klar
- Anfängerfreundlichkeit
- 45/100