Clarify license inconsistency between CONTRIBUTING and license notice

## Title

Clarify license inconsistency between CONTRIBUTING and license notice

## Description

Hi GitHub Copilot App maintainers,

I noticed a potential inconsistency between the contributing guidelines and the license information in this repository.

In the **Contributing** section, it says:

> Contributions to this project are released to the public under the project's open source license.

However, the license information appears to state only:

> © GitHub, Inc. All rights reserved.

This is confusing because **“All rights reserved”** does not appear to indicate an open source license, while the contributing guidelines refer to the project’s open source license.

I am particularly interested in this clarification because I work for a large enterprise and need to understand the app’s licensing terms clearly before evaluating its use or making any contribution.

Could you please clarify:

- Which license applies to this project?
- Under which license are contributions accepted?
- Is this repository intended to be open source?
- If an open source license applies, could a corresponding `LICENSE` file or license notice be added or updated?

This clarification would help contributors and enterprise users understand the legal terms before submitting issues, pull requests, code contributions, or evaluating the app for use.

Thank you!

先阅读 CONTRIBUTING 部分和 repository 的许可证声明，然后检查是否存在 LICENSE 文件或其他许可证元数据。与维护者确认项目和贡献所采用的许可证；当文档一致地说明这些条款，并且任何需要的 LICENSE 文件或声明都已更新时，即表示完成。

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。