github / github/annotation-toolkit

[Feature request] Split and refine the Mobile accessibility checklist

未关闭
#43 3 条评论 0 个 reaction 已指派 0 人 在 GitHub 查看
improvement planned set:mobile-annotations set:utilities
主要语言
没有语言数据
星标
320
派生
33
平均合并
36 分钟
30 天内合并 PR
2

描述

### Description

The first version of the Mobile accessibility checklist is now live in the [repository](https://github.com/github/annotation-toolkit/blob/main/checklists/mobile-checklist.md) and on the [primer.style docs site](https://primer.style/accessibility/tools-and-resources/checklists/mobile-checklist/) (shipped via #41, closing #36).

In practice, the mobile checklist ended up about twice as long as the existing web checklists. That length makes it harder to scan and harder to hand to a single audience without a lot of "skip this section" caveats. This issue tracks the follow-up edits and improvements needed to bring it in line with the rest of the toolkit.

### Requested change

Refactor the Mobile checklist into multiple, more focused variants, mirroring how the web checklists are split today:

- **Split by audience:** Separate the content into a mobile **designer** checklist and a mobile **engineer** checklist, so each role only sees items relevant to their phase of work.
- **Split by depth:** Offer a **full** checklist (the comprehensive list we have now) and a **high-impact** short list that surfaces the most critical items for teams who can't run through the full thing on every project.
- **Rebuild the Figma component:** Update the Checkpoints component in the Figma library so the new variants are selectable as properties, consistent with the existing web checklist component. This is a heavier lift than the markdown work since the current

贡献指南

打开贡献指南

调研方向

Start with checklists/mobile-checklist.md and compare it with the existing web checklists to define designer, engineer, full, and high-impact variants. Then inspect the Checkpoints component in the Figma library and the work shipped in #41; done means the markdown variants are usable without skip-section caveats and the Figma component exposes the new variants as selectable properties.

由索引模型根据 Issue 内容生成。

评估

技术栈
figma
领域
accessibility, design, documentation
Issue 类型
功能
难度
4/5
预计耗时
3-5 天
活跃度
冷清
描述清晰度
基本清楚
新手友好度
45/100

把新 issue 发到你的邮箱

精选适合新手参与的 GitHub issue 摘要。