github / github/annotation-toolkit
[Improvement] Standardize verbiage and property names across Details components
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 320
- Forks
- 33
- Avg merge
- 36m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 2
Description
### Description
Component properties across the various Details components have inconsistencies in:
- Use of ? marks in property names
- Capitalization
- General verbiage and naming conventions
### Requested change
Audit all Details component properties and standardize them so they follow a consistent pattern. This will make the toolkit more predictable and easier to learn for new users.
Contributor guide
Research direction
Start by locating all Details components in the Figma asset library and inventory their properties, noting differences in question marks, capitalization, and wording. Define a consistent naming pattern from the existing toolkit conventions, then verify that every Details component follows it.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- figma
- Domain
- design
- Issue type
- Refactor
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100