getappmap / getappmap/appmap-java
Recordings show when control is transferred into a thread by an ExecutorService
@apotterri 已经在做这个了。
开始于 2024年3月20日。
- 主要语言
- Java
- 星标
- 88
- 派生
- 17
- 平均合并
- 2 天 2 小时
- 30 天内合并 PR
- 1
描述
Currently, if an HTTP endpoint (e.g. a Spring Controller) uses an ExecutorService to run a task, none of that processing shows up in the AppMap. For example:
@DeleteMapping("dolphins")
public String dolphins() throws ExecutionException, InterruptedException {
ExecutorService executorService = Executors.newCachedThreadPool();
Future<Object> future1 = executorService.submit((Callable<Object>)() -> {
DolphinChat dc = new DolphinChat();
dc.say("So");
dc.say("long,");
});
Future<Object> future2 = executorService.submit((Callable<Object>)() -> {
DolphinChat dc = new DolphinChat();
dc.say("and thanks for");
dc.say("all the fish");
});
NextUp nu = new NextUp();
nu.say("Mostly Harmless");
return future1.get() + " " + future2.get();
}
the calls to DolphinChat methods won't show up in the AppMap.
Instead, the (pseudo) events should look like this:
{http_server_request, thread: 1}
{call, method: ExecutorService.submit, thread:1}
{call, method: Runnable.run, thread: 1, task:true}
{call, method: DolphinChat.say("So"), thread: 1}
{return, parent: DolphinChat.say, thread: 1}
{call, method: DolphinChat.say("long"), thread: 1}
{return, parent: DolphinChat.say, thread: 1}
{return, parent:Runnable.run, thread: 1}
{return, parent: ExecutorService.submit, thread: 1} // when get is called on the Future returned by submit
{call, method: ExecutorService.submit, thread:1}
{call, method: Runnable.run, thread: 1, task:true}
{call, method: DolphinChat.say("and thanks for"), thread: 1}
{return, parent: DolphinChat.say, thread: 1}
{call, method: DolphinChat.say("all the fish"), thread: 1}
{return, parent: DolphinChat.say, thread: 1}
{return, parent:Runnable.run, thread: 1}
{return, parent: ExecutorService.submit, thread: 1} // when get is called on the Future returned by submit
{call, method: NextUp.say("Mostly Harmless"), thread: 1}
{return, parent: NextUp.say, thread: 1}
{http_server_response, thread: 1}
This says they all have the same thread id (that matches the thread that creates the ExecutorService). The ordering of the call and return events show that the calls to DolphinChat.say happened in a Runnable/Callable submitted to an ExecutorService. Note that the order of the complete Runnable.run call chains may not match the order in the code, of course, because they were run on separate threads.
Test cases:
- end-to-end, for an endpoint like
dolphins, generates an AppMap - checkpoint is disabled once
ExecutorService.submithas been called - classes referenced only in a task show up in the classmap of the final AppMap
- both a
CallableandRunnablepassed toExecutorService.submitare handled correctly - process recording for a call to
dolphinsgenerates an AppMap - remote recording that spans a call to the
dolphinsendpoint generates an AppMap - task recording stops when
Future.cancelis called. [What should happen to the task's recording?] - task recording stops when the method that called
ExecutorService.submitreturns. [What should happen if there are outstandingFutures?]
贡献指南
从这里开始
- 先读完整个 Issue,再读项目的贡献指南。
- 在 Issue 下留言说明你要接手 —— 这能避免两个人做同样的事。
- Fork 仓库,在一个分支上完成修改。
- 提交 Pull Request,并在描述里引用这个 Issue 编号。
评估
这个 Issue 还没有评估数据。