[Issue]: Developing the infrastructure for the PDAP review for foundational and technical alignment

### Issue Title

Developing the infrastructure for the PDAP review for foundational and technical alignment

### Issue Type

Process Improvement

### Problem Statement

As part of the workshop we created a set of processes which TSAC will use to produce a product review. We need to execute this to create a good system

### Scope Validation

This is helping TASC execute their review process and will help other foundational workstreams

### Proposed Solution(s)

See above. We need

- Document the process we are going to use (perhaps in a readme)
- The repository where these issues and reports will reside
- The machine users for GitHub so tasc can act as a unified voice when submitting issues elsewhere supporting this process

Decision made here was (ADR needed)
- One repo for all product reviews
- Top level splits by area of review i.e. TASC, security, AI, REWS
- Generate sensible tags which allow us to indicate on issues which pertains to which area

### Estimated Effort Level

Low (1-2 months, minimal resources)

### Success Criteria

_No response_

### How will this issue aid GA4GH harmonization?

Helps PDAP

### Additional context

Please provide any additional pieces of information you feel is relevant to this issue

### Work Streams Raising This Issue

- [ ] Clinical & Phenotypic Data (Clin/Pheno)
- [ ] Cloud Work Stream
- [ ] Data Security
- [ ] Data Use & Researcher IDs (DURI)
- [ ] Discovery
- [ ] Genomic Knowledge Standards (GKS)
- [ ] Large Scale Genomics (LSG)
- [ ] Regulatory & Ethics (REWS)
- [ ] Data Models & Schemas Committee (DaMaSC)
- [ ] Genomic Implementation Forum (GIF)
- [ ] Technical Team
- [ ] Other (specify below)

### Other Groups Raising This Issue

_No response_

### Work Streams That Will Be Impacted

- [ ] Clinical & Phenotypic Data (Clin/Pheno)
- [ ] Cloud Work Stream
- [ ] Data Security
- [ ] Data Use & Researcher IDs (DURI)
- [ ] Discovery
- [ ] Genomic Knowledge Standards (GKS)
- [ ] Large Scale Genomics (LSG)
- [ ] Regulatory & Ethics (REWS)
- [ ] Data Models & Schemas Committee (DaMaSC)
- [ ] Genomic Implementation Forum (GIF)
- [ ] Technical Team
- [ ] Other (specify below)

### Other Groups That Will Be Impacted

_No response_

### Key Stakeholders to Consult

_No response_

### Products affected

Please list them here. It does not need to be exhaustive

### Additional Context

_No response_

### Priority Level

Critical (blocking multiple work streams, immediate attention needed)

### Additional Tags

- [ ] Documentation
- [ ] API
- [ ] Schema
- [ ] Security
- [ ] Performance
- [ ] Interoperability
- [ ] Compliance
- [ ] User Experience
- [ ] Infrastructure
- [ ] Testing