Request is going to another AI model that we didnt selected

Ouverte
#690 1 commentaire 0 réactions 1 personne assignée Voir sur GitHub

@naymurdev y travaille déjà.

Depuis le 17/8/2026.

Évaluation

Cette issue n'a pas encore été évaluée.

Description

windows

Bug: Model selection appears to leak between CLI tabs

Environment

  • Command Code CLI: v1.26.0
  • OS: Windows 10
Description

I noticed an issue where the model selected in one Command Code CLI tab appears to affect another already-running tab.

My workflow was:

  1. I had a main Command Code tab using Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor for my main implementation work.
  2. I opened a second CLI tab and temporarily selected GLM 5.3 to review some code.
  3. I made only 2 prompts in the GLM 5.3 tab because of the higher cost, then closed that tab.
  4. I continued working in the original tab, which was still configured to use Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor.
  5. However, when I checked the usage logs afterward, every request made after using the second tab was attributed to GLM 5.3, even though I continued using the original Muse Spark 1.2 tab.

This resulted in approximately $8–$9 of unexpected usage today.

Expected behavior

The model selection should remain isolated to the respective CLI session/tab. The original tab should continue using Muse Spark 1.2 Contributor after the second tab is closed.

Actual behavior

Selecting GLM 5.3 in a second CLI tab appears to have changed the model used by the original tab as well, causing subsequent requests from the original tab to be processed/recorded as GLM 5.3.

Impact

This can silently switch users to a significantly more expensive model without them realizing it, resulting in unexpected usage costs.

Could you please investigate whether model selection/state is being shared between CLI sessions/tabs in v1.26.0, and why subsequent requests from the original Muse Spark 1.2 session are being routed to GLM 5.3?

I can provide the usage logs/screenshots showing the model selection and request history.

Image Image Image
Expected Behavior

nil

Actual Behavior

nil

Steps to reproduce the issue

nil

Command Code Version

Unknown

Operating System

Windows

Terminal/IDE

Unknown

Shell

cmd.exe

Session file (optional)

No response

Fix prompt (optional)

No response

Additional context

No response

Langage dominant
Aucune donnée de langage
Étoiles
4k
Forks
350
Métriques de merge des PR
Aucune PR mergée en 30 j

Guide de contribution

Aucun guide de contribution indexé pour ce dépôt

Par où commencer

  1. Lisez l'issue en entier, puis le guide de contribution du projet.
  2. Signalez en commentaire que vous la prenez — cela évite que deux personnes fassent le même travail.
  3. Forkez le dépôt et travaillez sur une branche.
  4. Ouvrez une pull request qui référence le numéro de l'issue.

Autres issues de CommandCodeAI/command-code

Toutes les issues de CommandCodeAI/command-code

Recevez les nouvelles issues par e-mail

Un résumé court des issues GitHub adaptées aux débutants.