exercism / exercism/python

[Error-Handling]: instructions are unclear, and wrong programs pass the tests

Offen
#1,780 11 Kommentare 0 Reaktionen 1 zugewiesene Person Beansprucht von @BethanyG Auf GitHub ansehen
bug 🐛 smolder🍲
Vorherrschende Sprache
Python
Sterne
2.5k
Forks
1.5k
PR-Merge-Kennzahlen
Keine gemergten PRs in 30 T.

Beschreibung

I just did the error-handling exercise, and had several issues:

- It was unclear at first what to do with inputs. Looking at the tests, it seemed that trying to convert the input to `int` was the right thing to try, but this is not mentioned in the readme or the stubs.
- The test for whether a method throws an exception will pass any error that might occur, not just if it's intentionally raised:
```python
def handle_error_by_throwing_exception():
raise "(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻" # Raising a string is a TypeError, but passes the test
```
- When returning a tuple, which element should be the result and which one the status? What should the result element be when it fails? No suggestion
- No mention of advantages or disadvantages of the different kinds of error handling, or what is idiomatic Python.

Beitragsleitfaden

Beitragsleitfaden öffnen

Bewertung

Dieses Issue wurde noch nicht bewertet.

Neue Issues direkt in Ihr Postfach

Eine kurze Übersicht über anfängerfreundliche GitHub-Issues.